<< NEWS BRIEFLETS ~ MAIN ~ HEADINGLEY 1981 TO BE AVENGED! >>

7,000 SIGNATURES IN AUSTRALIA = NYT COVERAGE

The New York Times is het up about GetUp!:

In a little more than a week, a new grass-roots political movement here has gathered more than 7,000 names of supporters on its Web site in a campaign to free David Hicks, an Australian citizen being held in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.

The organization, GetUp!, was founded this month by two young Australians. They collected the names for a letter to the Australian foreign minister, Alexander Downer, demanding that he take action to have Mr. Hicks, 30, brought back to Australia to stand trial ...

“We’re blown away,” Lachlan Harris, a spokesman for GetUp!, said about the response to the campaign. “Signing a letter for someone accused of serious crimes is not something one does lightly.”

GetUp! must take the crimes Hicks is accused of pretty lightly – the organisation’s letter doesn’t mention them at all. Nor does it mention what charges Hicks should face before an Australian court.

(Via Alan R.M. Jones)

Posted by Tim B. on 08/28/2005 at 09:14 AM
  1. The petition started by Starmen.net to Nintendo for them to revive the Earthbound series (called Mother in Japan) got 10,013 (their goal was 10,000, so it stopped after that).

    It even worked (for Japan anyway), where is their NYT coverage? And why can’t GetUp! do better then an old videogame series?

    Posted by Aging Gamer on 2005 08 28 at 10:41 AM • permalink

  2. Signing a petition via the’net is a thing not done lightly?  Good gad, the boundaries of heroism have expanded mightily.

    Posted by ushie on 2005 08 28 at 10:48 AM • permalink

  3. Aging Gamer states it more cleverly.

    The size of the number never matters.  P.J. O’Rourke (I think) once said, you could tack on a couple of zeros to the death tolls reported from third world train wrecks and you’d still get yawns from readers and viewers. 

    Similarly, tens of thousands can gather in the name of causes the Times disagrees with, and the event may well have never taken place given the coverage.  Don’t we get it?  The Times decides what is, and what is not, news!

    Posted by cosmo on 2005 08 28 at 10:48 AM • permalink

  4. An online petition garners a “whopping” 7,000 signatures and the Old Grey Lady swoons? The blockheads at the Democrat Party mouthpiece don’t know much about online petitions, do they?

    Posted by Spiny Norman on 2005 08 28 at 11:19 AM • permalink

  5. Looks like they poached the story from the blogs and purposefully spun in their way.  7,000 signatures, and Hicks is a “lost soul”? 

    Even the Times, so experienced at spin, cannot pull this lie off.

    Posted by Patricia on 2005 08 28 at 11:49 AM • permalink

  6. I wonder how many of those “names” would fail a simple audit.

    Posted by Bruce Rheinstein on 2005 08 28 at 12:33 PM • permalink

  7. Bruce, those good citizens I.P. Freely and Seymour Butts are just politically active.  Their names sure do end up on a lot of petitions.

    Posted by David Crawford on 2005 08 28 at 01:52 PM • permalink

  8. Does this mean John Kerry’s various petitions didn’t even get 7,000 signatures?

    Posted by PW on 2005 08 28 at 02:11 PM • permalink

  9. Bruce Rheinstein — I wonder how many of those signatures were us?

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 08 28 at 02:44 PM • permalink

  10. 7000 signatures is newsworthy! Are they under the impression that Australia is a little South Pacific Island nation, sort of like Nauru or Niue?

    Posted by Ross on 2005 08 28 at 02:55 PM • permalink

  11. “Signing a letter for someone accused of serious crimes is not something one does lightly.”

    Au contraire! That Howard war criminal petition debacle of last week was certainly something I took very lightly indeed. And my contribution(s) ended up DELETED. That should be the news of the day.

    “Terrorist Teacher tackles Howardian crimes”

    Posted by CB on 2005 08 28 at 04:28 PM • permalink

  12. “Signing a letter for someone accused of serious crimes is not something one does lightly.”


    That’s it.  No one, NO ONE, can continue to satarize people like this.  Sarcasm has failed us.  I QUIT!  *throws his hands in the air helplessly*

    Posted by Sortelli on 2005 08 28 at 05:13 PM • permalink

  13. So, let me get this straight, this means he should be released, right?

    So if Osama can get 7,000 signatures on a petition to leave him alone, we should do that to?

    Posted by Quentin George on 2005 08 28 at 05:16 PM • permalink

  14. I signed the petition.
    In the comments section I told Downer not to listen to these fools and keep up the good work.
    I wonder if they counted my letter?

    Posted by gubba on 2005 08 28 at 07:23 PM • permalink

  15. Not only did they fail to mention what charges Hicks should face before an Australian court but they refuse to respond to that very question I posed to them on the 18th August. Still haven’t received a response. To test the waters I sent an email to ask about submitting a “member profile” for their site and it only took 20 minutes to get a response.
    Witness the vibrant intellectual discourse of the left wing folks.

    Posted by Hank Reardon on 2005 08 28 at 07:34 PM • permalink

  16. I suspect this ultimately isn’t going to get the Australian left any more votes. Like the USA online efforts, they’re probably just getting people who already agree with them, not changing any minds.

    Posted by JimC on 2005 08 28 at 08:45 PM • permalink

  17. Yep, I signed as Issac Hunt and Wilma Fingadeux. I wonder if I’m counted?

    Posted by Gibbo on 2005 08 28 at 09:36 PM • permalink

  18. GetUp’s shady origins exposed by Glen Milne in The Ausralian:

    This self-proclaimed non-partisan, progressive organisation has a website that features advertising campaigns targeting the dangers of unfettered government power in the Senate. But last week, Hewson decided to end his association with GetUp!. His departure followed questions raised in this column about the organisation’s company structure and its aggressive soliciting of money and personal details from subscribers.

    With Hewson went GetUp!‘s bipartisan fig leaf. The remaining members of the board are all from the political Left.

    As one might expect it’s a crock. Read Glen Milne’s piece here.

    Posted by walterplinge on 2005 08 28 at 11:02 PM • permalink

  19. Quentin George.  That’s what Clinton did with OBL and he didn’t even need those lousy 7,000!

    Posted by yojimbo on 2005 08 28 at 11:06 PM • permalink

  20. non-partisan, progressive organisation

    Wait, how can something be simultaneously progressive AND non-partisan?

    ... yeah, I know, I should know better than to ask.

    Posted by Sortelli on 2005 08 29 at 12:16 AM • permalink

  21. Wow, 7000 signatures!  Hmmmmmm…...Australia has an estimated population of 20,090,437 (CIA World Factbook)....wow, man, that’s 0.035% of the population. 

    Woo hoo!  The liberal left is ascendant once again in Australia!  John HoWARd had better start looking for sanctuary!

    </sarcasm>

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2005 08 29 at 01:27 AM • permalink

  22. C’mon, Jeff!  It’s not like SIGNING A PETITION is something one does LIGHTLY.

    Posted by Sortelli on 2005 08 29 at 02:09 AM • permalink

  23. Sortelli-that was a rather HEAVY HANDED remark!

    Regarding #20.  It’s postmodernism. Whatever it takes is ok. Whatever works is ok.  Logic has nothing to do with it. Contradiction?  What contradiction?

    Posted by yojimbo on 2005 08 29 at 02:21 AM • permalink

  24. Sortelli, being HEAVY HANDED?  Never!!  Who woulda thunk that?

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2005 08 29 at 03:55 AM • permalink

  25. Who comes up with these stupid org names? GetUp?

    How about:
    GetDown!
    GetYaFunkOn!
    GetOverIt!
    GetALoadOfThisCrap!
    GetALife!

    I could go on, but I’m boring even myself.

    Posted by mojo on 2005 08 29 at 03:03 PM • permalink

  26. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.