<< O BONZA TREE ~ MAIN ~ CLEAR NEED IDENTIFIED >>

A GOOD YEAR FOR FREEDOM

Merry Christmas to ... the world:

This week, Freedom House released its survey for 2005. The survey grades each country (from a best of 1 to a worst of 7) and then simplifies these scores into a broader categorization of “free,” “partly free” or “not free.” (For example, the U.S. and Australia are “free”; Burma and Cuba are “not free”; Turkey and Nigeria are “partly free.”) Because countries usually evolve gradually, not many of the numeric scores change in any one year, and even a rise or fall in a country’s score is usually insufficient to move it from one of the three broad categories to another.

This year, however, more countries than usual changed category. Eight countries plus the Palestinian Authority, not yet officially a country, moved up — either from “not free” to “partly free” or from “partly free” to “free.” Four countries moved down. In all, this made it a good year for freedom.

The piece offers some credit for this to George W. Bush’s “strategy of promoting freedom and democracy, including by means of war in Iraq”:

Saad Edin Ibrahim, the dean of Egyptian dissidents and an opponent of the war in Iraq, said recently that it had “unfrozen the Middle East just as Napoleon’s 1798 expedition did.”

Merry Christmas to ... US forces:

Rumsfeld helped serve the soldiers a dinner of rib-eye steak, lobster, crab legs, Cornish game hens and all the seasonal fixings. Grinning widely and wearing a white cooks hat, he worked his tongs as many of the soldiers snapped pictures of him and politely asked for their helpings.

“Steak’s the big seller tonight,” he declared after the first several dozen soldiers had gone through the line.

And Merry Christmas to ... Jim Lowney! But saaaaad Christmas to ... British Liberal Democrats:

According to Lib Dem calculations, a team of nine reindeer would emit methane with a global-warming impact equivalent to 40,667 tonnes of carbon dioxide as they covered the 122 million miles needed for Santa to deliver presents to every house in the world.
This makes his sleigh ride almost as environmentally unfriendly as an aircraft, which would produce 41,480 tonnes of CO2 on the Christmas Eve trip.

And saaaaad Christmas to ... The Independent’s Martin Hickman:

Gifts are made at factories that use lots of energy and contribute to global warming. Finite and diminishing natural resources such as metals go into them. In particular, plastics use a high amount of oil, yet these goods are often poor quality and disposable, something especially so for toys at Christmas.

Transporting these products to the shops results in more energy use and pollution.

Intensive food production to sate our festive appetite discourages wildlife and allows pesticides to leach into streams and rivers ...

The only bright spot environmentally is that while we are stuffing our mouths with food or ripping open our presents (wrapped with disposable paper), we are not jumping into our cars and spewing pollution from the exhaust pipes. Or working in factories to supply goods for the next Christmas.

Actually, reducing pollution is bad for the environment. Martin hasn’t been keeping up with the very latest scientific discoveries.

Posted by Tim B. on 12/25/2005 at 09:26 AM
  1. Rumsfeld ... worked his tongs as many of the soldiers snapped pictures of him and politely asked for their helpings.

    “More plastic steak, sir?”

    Posted by Rittenhouse on 2005 12 25 at 10:59 AM • permalink

  2. Uh-huh. Plastic steak, styrofoam lobster, and holographic crab legs.

    And the “Cornish” hens were from Devonshire.

    I got your number, Grinny McRum$feldman.

    Posted by Dave S. on 2005 12 25 at 11:26 AM • permalink

  3. Saad Edin Ibrahim, the dean of Egyptian dissidents and an opponent of the war in Iraq, said recently that it had “unfrozen the Middle East just as Napoleon’s 1798 expedition did.”

    Can we now call him Napoliburton W. Busholini?

    Posted by Tommy Shanks on 2005 12 25 at 11:59 AM • permalink

  4. The W stands for Whitler!

    Posted by ushie on 2005 12 25 at 12:01 PM • permalink

  5. Finite and diminishing natural resources such as metals

    This “educated idiot” has not heard of Julian Simon, else he wouldn’t be making such and ass of himself… on the other hand… yes, he probably would.
    http://www.overpopulation.com/faq/People/julian_simon.html

    Posted by Franklin on 2005 12 25 at 12:24 PM • permalink

  6. How can metals be diminished?

    (Where do they go?)

    Posted by Rittenhouse on 2005 12 25 at 05:41 PM • permalink

  7. They’re eaten by dragonsm of course.

    What a bunch of grinches.

    Posted by Michael Lonie on 2005 12 25 at 06:53 PM • permalink

  8. Hickman needs to get a refund for his education.

    All those years and nobody ever told him that metals were very recyclable?

    Well, either that, or to hand his diploma(s) back for having slept through most of his schooling.

    Posted by steveH on 2005 12 25 at 08:17 PM • permalink

  9. We’re running out of metal?  SON OF A BITCH!  Well, can’t blame it on this right wing death beast, I have been drinking from the tap for years.  In emergencies (such as only budcoorsbusch available on tap) I have had to use bottles.  BUT NOT OUR PRECIOUS CANS!!

    Posted by jeff mccabe on 2005 12 25 at 10:02 PM • permalink

  10. According to Lib Dem calculations, a team of nine reindeer would emit methane with a global-warming impact equivalent to 40,667 tonnes of carbon dioxide as they covered the 122 million miles needed for Santa to deliver presents to every house in the world.
    This makes his sleigh ride almost as environmentally unfriendly as an aircraft, which would produce 41,480 tonnes of CO2 on the Christmas Eve trip.

    Wow.  Someone needs a stickectomy.

    Posted by Teemo on 2005 12 25 at 10:46 PM • permalink

  11. Oh my god that reindeer thing is the funniest thing I’ve seen all day.

    Posted by tachyonshuggy on 2005 12 26 at 02:38 AM • permalink

  12. Regarding the Christmas dinner served by Rumsfeld…..it’s a good bet that the troops are using plastic flatware to eat with.  So there’s SOME plastic involved.

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2005 12 26 at 03:14 AM • permalink

  13. Shouldn’t Martin Hickman be jumping into a shredder and converting himself into liquid fertiliser to prevent his “humans are pollution” being seen as hypocritical? Not that hypocrisy has ever worried lefties.

    Posted by Jim Geones on 2005 12 26 at 06:35 AM • permalink

  14. Martin Hickman issues a timely warning of the type of behaviour that could leave the unfortunate perpetrator at the top of the food chain.

    Posted by Henry boy on 2005 12 26 at 08:59 PM • permalink

  15. Martin Hickman = misery guts

    Posted by kae on 2005 12 28 at 07:40 PM • permalink

  16. How about non-government thugs telling the UN what not to do.

    Posted by blogstrop on 2005 12 30 at 06:16 AM • permalink

  17. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.