<< YOUR ABC ~ MAIN ~ IRAQ ERA VETERANS >>
AXIS OF DAVID
David Hicks, the anti-war Left’s favourite anti-Semitic fascist, has the support of charming Holocaust-denial think-tank the Adelaide Institute:
What does Adelaide born David Hicks have in common with Ernest Hemmingway and Arthur Koestler? Well, the short answer to that is, more than you might imagine, for each of the three was (is in the case of Hicks) an adventurous spirit with the soul of a poet.
Dave’s poetic soul tends to thoughts of “Western-Jewish domination” and “the Jews’ propaganda war machine”. No wonder the Adelaide Institute admires him:
The Zionist Israeli Jews are no different from a well known deadly disease we all despise and hate, a malicious disease called Cancer.
Our progressive pals at GetUp! are also hot for poet boy:
The GetUp! team nominates Guantanamo Bay detainee David Hicks and the industrial relations reforms as potential campaigns in coming months.
Campaign away, blockheads.
(Via Alan R.M. Jones)
With Apologies to the late Douglas Adams:
Jihadi 1: It isn’t easy being a jihadi. We don’t really want to shoot you. You know, you’re not dealing with a couple of dumb, trigger happy morons with low hairlines, little piggy eyes, and no conversation.
Jihadi 2: No!
J1: We are a couple of kind, caring guys, who you’d probably quite like if you met us socially.
J2: Yeah!
J1: I don’t go around gratuitously shooting people and then bragging about it in seedy souks.
J2: No!
J1: I go around shooting people gratuitously and then agonise about it to my girlfriend!
J2: Yeah, he does! And I write novels!
J1: He writes them in crayon.
J2:But I haven’t had any published yet, so I,m in a mean mood!It’s Hemingway, with ONE M.
Illiterate, ignorant Nazi scum.Posted by Honkie Hammer on 2005 08 19 at 02:46 AM • permalink“vinny”:
“Progressive” is a codeword used by those who are much more wonderful, dedicated and caring than the rest of us.
If you want some idea of how they think and what they believe, I recommend the following site:
WARNING: As you read, try to control your gag reflex!
Posted by JJM Ballantyne on 2005 08 19 at 02:47 AM • permalinkTim, I must protest. You are sullying the name of all blockheads everywhere with this thoughtless and insensitive comparison.
As you will be aware, the blockheads are an international organisation devoted to the destruction of Gumby and all his evil ways.
That’s right, those blockheads.
I must therefore ask, on behalf of all blockheads that you withdraw your comments.
The Zionist Israeli Jews are no different from a well known deadly disease we all despise and hate, a malicious disease called Cancer.
This is an odd thing to say in the week when the Zionist Israeli Jewish government of Sharon pulled out of Gaza. When did you last hear of a cancer voluntarily getting smaller?
why is everyone called a ‘progressive’ these days…...what does it mean??
Progressive means Communist or, since Communism died in the arse a decade ago, rabidly Socialist. The various Progressive Parties of the 30s and 40s were thinly-disguised Communist fronts.
Posted by walterplinge on 2005 08 19 at 05:09 AM • permalinkIt seems that a Havard MBA does instill much sense these days, if the halfwits at GetFucked think that Hicks is a rallying point then they are sillier than they look.
No one gives a shit about Hicks other than the narrow minority who seem to think theres political points to be scored.
Keep up the good work ladies!
ilibcc, It’s completely awful that the Adelaide Institute is under the control of Nazis.
If you forward me the information you have about their Nazi membership I’ll start lobbying to stop their insidious influence.
Er, you do have some factual material to base your assertions on don’t you, or is this just another WMD line os spin?
Posted by The Real Jaffa on 2005 08 19 at 07:54 AM • permalinkGuys, don’t bother refuting bryla, aka “the Real Jaffa.” Summer repeats are so dull so he’s been banned.
Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2005 08 19 at 08:28 AM • permalink“The GetUp! team nominates Guantanamo Bay detainee David Hicks and the industrial relations reforms as potential campaigns in coming months.”
They certainly know how to market their product - that whole Dave Hicks thing is a real winner with voters and preventing employers taking on staff is bound to be popular…
Posted by Harry Buttle on 2005 08 19 at 08:40 AM • permalinkNice try, Bryla. Actually, no, a lousy try. If you weren’t so so lazy, you could click on the link for Adelaide Institute. If you did, you would see a picture captioned, “IN HONOUR OF RUDOLPH HEß”
Know who Rudolph HEß was? Or is this one of those historical facts that you so conveniently forget?
While this “Institute” doesn’t fly The Twisted Cross, they are clearly neo-Nazis.
(BTW, half of that page from the Adelaide Institute is in German. How odd, for an Australian organization)
Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2005 08 19 at 08:40 AM • permalinkRats! I missed Bryla!! Oh, well, he knows the rules.
Thanks, Andrea. He remains a clueless halfwit leftie.
Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2005 08 19 at 08:41 AM • permalinkWas that insensitive?
Only to the shotgun.
Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2005 08 19 at 10:08 AM • permalinkVinny — They became “proegressives” when people realized how many brown-skinned corposes the “liberals” of the West were piling up.
Of course, just as “liberals” aren’t, “progressives” don’t.
Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 08 19 at 10:12 AM • permalinkAntony Loewenstein rates publication on the site as well, though as that was some time ago I guess it is well known.
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/Dissenters/ashrawi_loewenstein.htm
Additionally he is published with interspersed commentary by Fredrick Töben, in a promotion of Margo’s “Not Happy, John! Defending our democracy”
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/newsletters/n230.htm
Aljazeerah published Antony as well. International standing no less.
International standing no less.
Yet another media whore, it seems. Anything for an appreciative audience.
Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2005 08 19 at 11:10 AM • permalinkMy brother-in-law is now resorting to calling himself a “progressive”. He used to be an unabashed liberal.
I asked him what the difference was between being a progressive and a liberal. He replied that there was no difference but that he had gotten tired of all the emotional baggage that had become attached to the word “liberal”.
Sheesh. brothers-in-law, you can’t choose them and it ain’t legal to hunt them. Yet!
Posted by joe bagadonuts on 2005 08 19 at 11:58 AM • permalinkErnest Hemingway… Hunter S. Thompson…. by all means, let’s encourage the left to emulate their heroes!
Posted by nofixedabode on 2005 08 19 at 12:29 PM • permalinkilibcc, It’s completely awful that the Adelaide Institute is under the control of Nazis.
If you forward me the information you have about their Nazi membership I’ll start lobbying to stop their insidious influence.
Er, you do have some factual material to base your assertions on don’t you, or is this just another WMD line os spin?
Now THAT’S funny. Yeah, people who say things like “The Zionist Israeli Jews are no different from a well known deadly disease we all despise and hate, a malicious disease called Cancer” are NOTHING like Nazis. I mean, not even close.
Jeez, Bryla feel out of the stupid-tree and hit every branch on the way down.
Dave S. just beat me to it. Liberal just doesn’t sell in the mainstream population. The left has always been very good about hiding who they actually are. Plus, “progressive” sounds much better and the left is all into feelings and words.
A good example is the abortion debate. Look at the changing verbage used to frame that debate.
There are a number of “solid” progressive sites here in States that people can turn to for reference. I realize that most here have a good grasp of this but for those who don’t I offer the following.
Progressive Policy Institute-ppionline.org
Very good reference site. This is classstruggle.com for the left.People for the American Way-pfaw.org.
They were moveon before there was a moveon. VERY important in political circles these days.Albert Shanker Institute-shankerinstitute.org.
If you ever wondered where youre modern liberal education came from.I hope that didn’t come over as pretentious but there are people who would like to get a good foundation but don’t know where to start given the bazillion sites these days. This is the progressive left in all their glory.
Strikingly similar to what’s going on in the U.S. where knuckledragging, mouth breathing Jew haters like David Duke and Justin Raimondo also love the new darling of the far (and increasingly, sadly, center) Left, Cindy “My son died for Israel and the PNAC/Neocon Agenda” Sheehan.
Posted by SoCalJustice on 2005 08 19 at 07:51 PM • permalinkDave, I’m a conservative with libertarian leanings. I confess to having voted for the Libertarian candidate for president in three elections. I’m more of a conservative these days, however I have not left my libertarian impulses completely. The thing about my particular ex-b-i-l was that he’s a wonderful guy, sweet-natured, kind, and generous. But his liberalism drove me nuts. He wasn’t really being honest. In his heart he was as conservative as I was, but he refused to acknowledge that. I think many liberals are supressing their conservative impulses in the mistaken belief that these impulses are not “nice.” They are too real. They are too close to the bone, and it scares them. They know that these impulses are really the truth. They know, for instance, that we need to kill the Islamics, that there is no other way, no arguing and pleading, feeding the crocodile so he will eat you last. Their instinct tells them that outright war is the only answer at this point. Their instinct tells them we need to blow these fuckers to kingdom come. Imagine how much that scares them! So they mistrust their own instincts. They deny common sense in favor of their “higher” consciousness. But they know it’s all bullshit.
They don’t want to be conservatives for other reasons as well, like the culture they’re in. It rewards liberalism. My ex-b-i-l didn’t want to be on the outside of that liberal society. It terrified him. So he kept up his pretense of liberalism in order to fit in with his crowd. It was sad. How many liberals do you figger are in that same situation? ekw
Everyone reading this should, as a matter of urgency, be writing to their nearest al-P represenatative telling them how badly they want David Hicks released back to Australia and freed. Tell them it your number 1 issue in the next election. Tell them of your concern about how few asylum swindlers are being let in to to the country. And don’t forget to mention that you’re a doctor’s wife. This is our best chance yet of getting the al-P primary vote below 37%.
Posted by Jim Geones on 2005 08 20 at 02:09 AM • permalinkIn his heart he was as conservative as I was, but he refused to acknowledge that. I think many liberals are supressing their conservative impulses in the mistaken belief that these impulses are not “nice.”
I see a lot of that. I worked with a guy who was totally anti-Bush, anti-Republican, anti-conservative. Yet his social views in casual conversation made me look like Al Gore by comparison. He really lost it when I showed him one of those Internet quizzes (“What political party are you?”) and he scored Republican. Still couldn’t admit it, though.
Dave S & ekw:
Many of us ‘neo-conservatives’ were/are just one good mugging away from embracing the Reality
basedCommunity.Unfortunately it seems as if there are far too many who will require some nuclear-sized catastrophic attack against our liberal western values before their comfortable ideological bunkers are breached.
What sucks a$$ is the realization that half of them will just creep back into the dark to claim Bushhitler and his Zionist cabalcade of evil were really responsible for such an attack.
‘After all…Didn’t you see the Jooos fleeing __LA__ before the blast?’
Yojimbo—remember the scene in Woody Allen’s “Sleepers” where he was told, “Civilization was destroyed when a man named Albert Shanker got hold of a nuclear warhead…”
Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 08 20 at 05:10 PM • permalinkI see a lot of that. I worked with a guy who was totally anti-Bush, anti-Republican, anti-conservative. Yet his social views in casual conversation made me look like Al Gore by comparison.
Seriously? I’ve encountered plenty of people who’d get on board with Dubya’s foreign policy but can’t get themselves to vote for the “Jesus freaks” party, but a social conservative who’s anti-Republican? Mindboggling.
I suspect ekw hit the nail on the head…the desire to fit in with your circle of friends and acquaintances must be stronger in some people than the desire to be honest with oneself.
I have to agree. I’m all for wiping out the middle east, but I can’t deal with the jesus freak part.
Whats up with that shit? How can you be pro-war while thumpin a bible?
Posted by Cornered Dog on 2005 08 20 at 07:35 PM • permalinkSometimes all I think is people are just naturally inconsistent. We are able to hold two thoughts or even beliefs in our heads at once. I think the Bible Belt people use the Old Testament when it suits them, and the New Testament where that seems better. But that’s child’s play when you think about the holy warriors for Allah. Just imagine the conflict that exists within the mind of the Islamist jihadi. I mean, there’s this kafr thing, the Infidels who are to be slaughtered, and then there’s Betty Lou, his really cute blonde kafr girlfriend at Florida State. Whom to kill, whom to fuck, whom to kill, whom to fuck…
You think Heidelberg? I thought it was weird that Cornered Dog appeared shortly after Bryla was banned again, and with a name that implies a persecution complex. But Bryla always uses email addresses that give him away (a sense of fairness? Ego? Gross stupidity?), so you have a point. It’s like some sort of troll reunion.
Heh, it’s not like substituting bad political theater, knee jerk insults and cheap emotional ploys for reason is a tactic exclusive to any one person on the left.
But my money’s on David none the less. I bet he and Bryla down a lot of liquid courage and paint their asses red before streaking through here like a tag team of stupidity.
You guys gotta tell me this stuff. I just wasted another hour writing something in answer to Cornered Dog who, I now hear, is a Bryla clone named Heidleberg. It was on another forum here, the veterans one. Boy. I am getting a fast education. Who else should I be wary of and not get into some discussion with? I think these people are vampires. They drink you dry and go on to the next thread and suck the blood out of that one.
“Cornered Dog” has just been sent to the pound. Let’s forget about him.
Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2005 08 20 at 09:01 PM • permalinkekw—rule of thumb: any time spent given a considered answer to a lefty is time wasted, since they don’t care what they’re saying and will change their subject instantly for a moment’s advantage. Think of it as having an argument with your first wife.
Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 08 20 at 10:49 PM • permalinkNah. It’s useless to convince them of anything, but I think it is good that we HAVE answers for their twaddle. It’s like with Saint Cindy, the entire spectacle is that she wants to ASK QUESTIONS and GET ANSWERS.
It’s a sham, because the questions are loaded and the answers have already been given, but giving the answers again only demonstrates the hollowness of their manufactured outrage.
Heidelberg, Byrla…...hmmmmmm…...is Heidelberg a gardner, perchance?
Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2005 08 21 at 05:36 AM • permalinkAre you saying that Heidelberg is banging Bryla’s wife?
Wow!
She told me I was the only one…..*sob*
Posted by Quentin George on 2005 08 21 at 07:36 AM • permalinkWell, I’m suggesting that it’s possible. I don’t know for certain, I don’t have a video camera in Bryla’s bedroom. SHUDDER!!!!!!
Still, it’s interesting that Bryla and Heidelberg seem to work as a tag team. It makes one thinks that they are sharing a computer. Among other things, perhaps?
Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2005 08 21 at 07:49 AM • permalinkWhat does Adelaide born David Hicks have in common with Ernest Hemmingway and Arthur Koestler? Well, the short answer to that is, more than you might imagine, for each of the three was (is in the case of Hicks) an adventurous spirit with the soul of a poet.
What does Adelaide born David Hicks have in common with Napolean Bonaparte and Adolf Hitler? Well, the short answer to that is, they’re short. Shorty short shorty short shorty short short. I hope Randy Newman is prosecuting.
Page 1 of 1 pages
Members:
Login | Register
| Member List
There once was a racist named Hicks
Nicked in Afghanistan’s sticks
Still raving ‘bout Jews
He’s paying his dues
In Gitmo he’s gettin’ no kicks
See, I have the soul of a poet, too.