<< "INNOCENT MENTORING" ~ MAIN ~ FEAR AND CONCERN >>

CAR BURNINGS ARE DOWN, HOWEVER

How many French cops have been wounded this year in conflicts with housing estate youths?

100?

500?

1000?

Try nearly 2500.

Posted by Tim B. on 10/05/2006 at 02:21 PM
  1. If the gendarmes shoot back once, they’ll be crucified by the International Media: even bigger riots will erupt and the police will be saddled with ALL of the blame. Cries of Racisme! will fly from all quarters and the French authorities will be forced to back down, apologise, and pay compensation.

    To be honest, I’m certain it is a matter of when, not if.

    Posted by Spiny Norman on 2006 10 05 at 02:28 PM • permalink

  2. Seems to me, the French should try the Gaza Option:  build walls around the banlieus and cut off welfare.  Then provide transportation for those who want to go home.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2006 10 05 at 02:29 PM • permalink

  3. Sounds like a quagmire to me. 

    /moonbat shrieks

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 10 05 at 02:37 PM • permalink

  4. How many French cops have been wounded this year in conflicts with housing estate youths?

    c’est la vie…OR when MentalFloss is here he can translate that to, Islam-speak.

    They have a potential Rudy Giuliani type, in Nicolas Sarkozy. This will show what Sarkosy, is made of.

    Go get ‘em Nicolas. Remember, it’s “the broken window” theory.

    Posted by El Cid on 2006 10 05 at 02:41 PM • permalink

  5. Hmmm.

    Monsieur Guillotine is always welcome in the Republic!

    All joking aside it’ll be curious to see how things work out when the French citizenry get pissed off enough to act on their own.  The French have a fairly long tradition of overthrowing governments that don’t follow the wishes of the people.

    Posted by memomachine on 2006 10 05 at 03:07 PM • permalink

  6. But to be fair, some of the wounds they are counting are actually when the rioters cause the officer’s souffle to fall.

    Not that it isn’t a tragedy all its own, you understand.

    Posted by Merlin on 2006 10 05 at 03:10 PM • permalink

  7. RebeccaH, you are correct to relate the problem to Gaza.  The rhetoric the French has used to describe that war is the same they are now using in the face of their own intifada:  It’s a cycle of violence.  We’ll soon see a “road map for peace” and the funerals will commence.

    Posted by saltydog on 2006 10 05 at 03:14 PM • permalink

  8. This dude would sort them out.

    Or even better, ED209. Don’t worry about the glitches.

    Posted by Dminor on 2006 10 05 at 03:28 PM • permalink

  9. “How many French cops have been wounded this year in conflicts with housing estate youths?”

    “Try nearly 2500.”

    And, they haven’t surrendered yet?

    That’s gotta be some kind of record.

    Posted by Dave Surls on 2006 10 05 at 03:39 PM • permalink

  10. Given the speed with which the french police flee the scene of a muslim riot i am surprised they are there long enough to sustain a wound.

    Unless they get trampled in the rush to the escape vehicle/police car.

    Posted by phillip on 2006 10 05 at 03:45 PM • permalink

  11. You guys better stop smirking. What happens when the Phrogs all move to Quebec? Hmmmm? Right there on our border, eating goose entrails and sneering and throwing burning Citroens in the Great Lakes? Then what are you gonna do?

    Posted by Gary from Jersey on 2006 10 05 at 04:19 PM • permalink

  12. Then what are you gonna do?

    I will stand on the south side of the border and shout: 

    Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelled of elderberry wine!

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 10 05 at 04:53 PM • permalink

  13. How bad have things gotten when I’m feeling sorry for a bunch of Frenchmen?

    Posted by SoberHT on 2006 10 05 at 05:13 PM • permalink

  14. Maybe they should just cede Paris and return to Vichy.

    Posted by Mark V. on 2006 10 05 at 05:26 PM • permalink

  15. A full belt of 7.62 will stop that, y’know.

    Posted by mojo on 2006 10 05 at 05:39 PM • permalink

  16. Mr Demarcq said that the increased attacks on officers were proof that the policy of “retaking territory” from criminal gangs was working.
    Sooooooooooo French. They said the same in WWII when they were retreating. “We’re retaking French territory. Viva La Francaise”.
    They’ve been repeating the same slime since.

    Posted by stats on 2006 10 05 at 05:54 PM • permalink

  17. Well put Tim, as usual.
    Yes we are continually told by Villepin and Chirac that this is “No probleme”.

    Imagine John Howard saying “no problem” if 2500 AUSSIE police got wounded by muslims from the Sydney and Melbourne enclaves?

    And how long before the Sorbonne profs tell their classes that in the same way that Jews were given the land of Israel,(whilst still shouting for its destruction) muslims must be allowed their enclaves within Eurabia?
    Is’nt that straight out of the multicult manual.
    The degenerate nihilism from the progressives now touches and attempts to destroy every element of European civilisation.
    Why should the French expect police, soldiers or even politicians to defend them when french society itself demonizes them at every opportunity when they engage in our defence.
    Wait for the crowds of “We are Hesbollah” lobotomised marxist degenerates sprouted from French Universities who will attack the police in solidarity with their muslim brethren when the Police attempt to restore law and order in those suburbs.

    Posted by davo on 2006 10 05 at 06:12 PM • permalink

  18. How do you say ‘grim milestone’ in French?

    Posted by cuckoo on 2006 10 05 at 06:29 PM • permalink

  19. Perhaps it would have to be a ‘grim 1,609.34-metre-stone’.  And I hear that those French police have quit the force to take up a less dangerous occupation: dolphin-hunting.

    Posted by cuckoo on 2006 10 05 at 06:32 PM • permalink

  20. I’m trying to imagine how many “youths” would be left if 2500 American cops were wounded…

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2006 10 05 at 06:48 PM • permalink

  21. ‘iowahawk’ once upon a time wrote a satire in which france was conquered by a U.S. high-school marching band visiting for the summer. angered by the constant gallic sneers about “why do you silly americans shower so much? it only dilutes the body’s natural oils”, the band kids snapped and went on a rampage. (although, it must be admitted, they did have the cheerleaders helping them.) it ended with the kids naming their newly-conquered country “france, junior”.

    and now this. 

    ah, well. (gallic shrug) i guess the french think that, in the end, it doesn’t matter whose boots you lick, so long as your pension is secure. germans, ‘youths’, conroe high school…they all speak french poorly, and can thus be thought less of. trevanian once wrote of french pride as “the egoism of the ant climbing the cow’s leg, all the while assuring her he will be gentle”.

    Posted by jimmy quest on 2006 10 05 at 06:56 PM • permalink

  22. Spiny and davo peg it.

    I’m never one to cut the French any slack.  But when it comes to law enforcement professionals, the gendarmes dilema is common throughout the West.

    Faced with a career-destroying charge of racism or brutality, the ensuing media circus, the routine failure of superiors to back up those in the field and the possibility of legal action, cops may decline to act in instances where, otherwise, we would expect the to act.

    Our thanks, once again, to those who’ve been insisting for decades that the ‘pigs’ are just part of the ‘oppressive’ ‘system.’

    Unfortunately, it’s never their neighborhoods that get the torch first.

    Posted by cosmo on 2006 10 05 at 06:58 PM • permalink

  23. There’s only one way to get rid of Middle Eastern youth crime. And that is to change newspapers.

    The Australian:

    A GANG of robbers has held up two men at gunpoint before stealing their car in Sydney’s west.

    The pair were approached by five young men of Middle Eastern appearance after parking outside a cinema on Parramatta Road in Auburn about 8.20pm yesterday, police said.

    The Sydney Morning Herald:

    A gang of robbers has held up two men at gunpoint before stealing their car in Sydney’s west.

    The pair were approached by five young men after parking outside a cinema on Parramatta Road in Auburn about 8.20pm yesterday, police said.

    I’m convinced the Herald is youthist.

    Posted by Henry boy on 2006 10 05 at 07:00 PM • permalink

  24. #11 Right there on our border, eating goose entrails

    If it stops the yearly Canadian goose invasion, I might have to go for it.  We can whip the French, but those geese are mean buggers.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2006 10 05 at 07:37 PM • permalink

  25. BTW
    How many FAUTOS of the Hesbollah war against Israel were pulled by REUTERS due to the diligence of the Blogworld?

    50
    100
    500
    700
    ???
    CLUE - five times more than i have of my family on my hard drive

    Posted by davo on 2006 10 05 at 07:43 PM • permalink

  26. 24 RebeccaH

    We can whip the French, but those geese are mean buggers.

    Yeah they are…‘till ya’ tap ‘em with a Sand Wedge…:).

    Posted by El Cid on 2006 10 05 at 08:07 PM • permalink

  27. This is surprising.  Beleive it or not, the French cops had a legendary reputation in the sixties and seventies for being ruthless on rioters.  The British leftists were terrified to cross the Channel for that reason.

    Looks like they’ve been girlified over the last two decades

    Posted by Big Jim on 2006 10 05 at 08:30 PM • permalink

  28. “unemployed youths of north African origin.”


    Very sad indeed, for both the French and the Africans.

    Also UK bbc article….

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/5410472.stm

    Jack Straw, the ex-foreign secretary, has angered Muslim groups by suggesting women who wear veils can make relations between communities more difficult.


    BRITAIN IS NOW A PSYCHOLOGICAL ISLAMIC STATE NOW…....BY FORCE OF THE CULTURE.

    Oh, check out find the different styles of scarves.. What the?? Check out the Shalyaor the niqab, it’ll be great for my golf days..,.


    Has this paper gone crazy has the whole of Islamic Britain lost it’s balls? Once again the lefties, use the “repsect” however, no respect at all is shown to the Brits.

    Posted by 1.618 on 2006 10 05 at 08:37 PM • permalink

  29. oops, the show respect technique to our culture.. well, Lamb rum-a-dumbs don’t use western products….

    We don’t want your oil or your culture it’s boring.

    Posted by 1.618 on 2006 10 05 at 08:39 PM • permalink

  30. The most amazing thing is that a mainstream newspaper used the words “radical muslims” and “intifada”. I thought the riots were philosophy majors protesting that someone had flushed a copy of Descartes down the latrine. Live and learn I suppose.

    Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2006 10 05 at 08:40 PM • permalink

  31. This culture hosts itself on the west but what it fails to understand is it will be downfall of everything.

    It’s a cross cultural bi-product which the western women did long ago, now it’s re-introduced and is confusing women from the west. This is not fair, on school education women’s western rights etc….

    These lamb imans are shop fronts for disaster and are creating delusional knowledge in an already deluded population.

    Posted by 1.618 on 2006 10 05 at 08:43 PM • permalink

  32. Exactly tiger : except I think therefore I am… is the wrong way around…

    Posted by 1.618 on 2006 10 05 at 08:44 PM • permalink

  33. LIve and learn by television but not infect your country by the multicultural experiment.

    Imagine Japan taking 10000000 islamic africans within their country, what would happen? Well, hopefully no whales would get hurt but it would introduce other things like halal.. etc, which only serves that culture not the whole culture…

    Posted by 1.618 on 2006 10 05 at 08:47 PM • permalink

  34. The mayor of Les Mureaux, Francois Garay, criticised aggressive police tactics that afterwards left “the people on the ground to pick up the pieces”.

    Ok, so the leftoid mayor of a collectivist society complains about aggressive police tactics.  Pretty sweet to be a cop in France I guess.

    Usually the Police are beating the snot out of the minority protesters with the majority clapping hands on the the sidelines (The African model).

    In more civilized countries, the rioters are ‘contained’ and the rioters are presented with overwhelming force to moderate their behavior (the Western model).

    ...or machinegunned. (the Asian model)

    You know, I read history and remember only one situation close to this one, where the police let the minority run wild to the point where no one was safe.  German political strife in the 20s and 30s.  I don’t believe this level of ‘youth’ violence is put up with in any other society in the world…including the ME.

    This is not a popular uprising.  This is insanity.

    Shall we start a pool over when Europe snaps and goes into it’s typical over-reaction mode…third time would be the charm, ya know.  Put me down for the summer of 2008.

    Oh, and please keep the Diggers home this time…we ain’t goin’ either.

    Posted by trainer on 2006 10 05 at 08:47 PM • permalink

  35. Hi trainer.. Could the problem lie in Lefty interpretation? It’s actually from a western perspective invasion but from the other side it’s oppression by the white socialists?

    Posted by 1.618 on 2006 10 05 at 08:48 PM • permalink

  36. For example, I can confirm this ideology has infiltrate Australian way.. good story..

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20533224-601,00.html

    “Chairman Mao” type ideologies in a speech to the History Teachers Association of Australia today.

    Posted by 1.618 on 2006 10 05 at 08:50 PM • permalink

  37. Wow, that’s amazing. Only 223 less than the number of US deaths in Iraq confirmed by the DoD.

    Posted by Miranda Divide on 2006 10 05 at 08:54 PM • permalink

  38. #37: Right. Oh, and several thousand fewer dead Muslim radicals.

    Posted by paco on 2006 10 05 at 09:20 PM • permalink

  39. TELEGRAM

    To: Surete, Paris, France
    From: Detective Paco, USA

    DON’T WORRY BOYS STOP I HAVE A MAN ON IT STOP

    Posted by paco on 2006 10 05 at 09:23 PM • permalink

  40. Mr Demarcq said that the increased attacks on officers were proof that the policy of “retaking territory” from criminal gangs was working.

    Does this statement make sense to anybody other than a frenchman ?

    Posted by Rachel Corrie's Flatmate on 2006 10 05 at 09:24 PM • permalink

  41. Oh, Pacccoooooooo.  Now who would smell your man in Paris, much less among the yoots?  You wouldn’t send in an unarmed agent, would you?

    Posted by saltydog on 2006 10 05 at 10:07 PM • permalink

  42. Shall we start a pool over when Europe snaps and goes into it’s typical over-reaction mode.

    Okay, I bet the bank that Europe does no such thing.  Europe is done.  It’s too old(and getting older), to weak, and too cowardly.

    I was listening to a report on BBC’s The World the other day, about towns across Europe adopting some sort of regulation that limited working practices so that they essentially favored the native ones as opposed to international ones( I’ll find the link if I can).  They interviewed some Spanish Johnny-on-the-spot and he said something to the effect of ‘It’s great because it allows us to maintain our culture in the face of all this immigration’.  Now my first thought is, ‘yeah thats great.  Won’t help you in a 100 years.  TRY HAVING SOME FUCKING KIDS!’ :)

    If Europe can’t do the most fundamental of things to maintain itself, like have kids and uphold basic European rights won throughout the centuries, it sure as hell isn’t going to snap over anything.  It’s going to lay down and die.

    Posted by Cornelius on 2006 10 05 at 10:07 PM • permalink

  43. #41: Holy une smoke, Salty Dog, you’ve got a good point there! Perhaps I had better send in the petite femme skunk fatale, instead, yes?

    Posted by paco on 2006 10 05 at 10:15 PM • permalink

  44. #39, thanks a heap, Detective Paco.  Now I have this image of some woman in a black burqa who leaned up against a lamp post just freshly painted (white, naturally), and your man spending the rest of his time in Paris trying to woo her.

    Perhaps the French would have better luck with this man?

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2006 10 05 at 10:20 PM • permalink

  45. #35-36

    Trying to place myself in the shoes of the mayor doesn’t help me.  I cannot see how the mayor can side with a rioting minority which sees his social system as an anathema, and which rejects even the most basic premise of French society: Liberty, Equality, Fraternity (even if they are only lip service to socialists).  I assume he was elected - and therefor has a responsibility to ensure the safety of all his constituents…including the ‘yoots’ and the police.

    We can see that the multicultural model is not working in Europe - if the ‘other’ is isolated and not encouraged to assimilate, they won’t.

    So, what is the end game?  How long can this go on, and how bad can it get?  Is France going to allow this level of friction forever?  It’s PC run amok.

    I don’t think so.  The French elections are going to be interesting.  Europe is always ahead of the curve when it comes to troubling times - we’d be wise to watch them very carefully.

    Posted by trainer on 2006 10 05 at 10:22 PM • permalink

  46. Right, Cornelius, apart from the language.
    I drove through many small rural French towns that looked deserted and dying. 
    The French have never understood decentralisation, so like Old Rome, they have drawn their people into their big centres [despite their chauvinist agricultural policy] and then invited the barbarians in to share the same space.
    Napoleon plus socialism isn’t a good look.

    Posted by Barrie on 2006 10 05 at 10:28 PM • permalink

  47. #44: Merde! Why didn’t I think of the great Clouseau?

    Posted by paco on 2006 10 05 at 10:36 PM • permalink

  48. #47:  Ooh, Ooh, Ooh, and have him use the Salty Sea Dog disguise!  It works. Salty Sea Dog blends in everywhere!

    (Ahem, Don’t ask me how I know that.)

    Posted by saltydog on 2006 10 05 at 10:50 PM • permalink

  49. I don’t know how many times I have to say this but it seems self-evident to me, MUSLIMS CAN’T FIGHT.

    The situation in Eurabia will continue to degenerate until the Muslims have the numbers to collapse the rule of law, either by bankrupting the economy or creating a situation of open civil war. Then the Europeans will genocidayl annihilate them, like they have a hundred times in the past to disorganized barbarian rabble all over the planet, from the time of the Romans on.

    All this “they’re too old and tired” is bullshit. The military, paramilitaries and police that have formed the backbone of murderous death squads in every ethnic civil war in modern history are never too tired to be let off the leash and finally do what they’ve been dreaming of for decades. A long period of friction and trouble has lead up to every modern genocidal outbreak, and the one brewing in Europe is no different. Personally I give it about 25 to 30 years, time for two more illiterate, hate-filled, unemployable muslim generations to swarm onto the scene, then the stage will be set.

    Muslims can’t fight. Even if they outnumber the Euros by 2 to one, which they won’t, they’d be wiped out. They have no unified command, no industrial base, no uniform military training, nothing. The Americans lost 18 rangers and Delta Force guys in Mogadishu, they killed 800 Somalis. Disorganized savages get destroyed when they go up against organized societies. Period.

    And yes, that even counts for the French.

    Posted by Amos on 2006 10 05 at 10:54 PM • permalink

  50. There’s going to be an outbreak of civil war in France before an outbreak of peace.

    Liberté, égalité, fraternité. Sharpen the blade, oil the wheels on the tumbrels.

    The Frogs are no good at wars with others but they do a beauty of a civil war.

    Heads will roll.

    Posted by Bonmot on 2006 10 05 at 11:06 PM • permalink

  51. I arrest you all in the name of the leahw!

    Have had that site bookmarked for years…every time I need a great guffaw…I read those Clouseau lines.

    Peter Sellers was brilliant, and I truly believe he despised the ZFrench so, he mocked them unmercifully, with Clouseau.

    Posted by El Cid on 2006 10 05 at 11:10 PM • permalink

  52. Housekeeper: You’ve ruined that piano!
    Clouseau: What is the price of one piano, compared to the terrible crime that has been committed here
    Housekeeper: But that’s a priceless Steinway!
    Clouseau: Nyot Anymeur.
    —————
    François: Do you know what kind of a bomb it was?
    Clouseau: Yes, the exploding kind
    —————
    Madame, that is by far the ugliest nose I have ever seen and I compliment you on it, it suits you!

    Rotflmao…

    Posted by El Cid on 2006 10 05 at 11:17 PM • permalink

  53. G’night all.

    Posted by El Cid on 2006 10 05 at 11:19 PM • permalink

  54. Does anyone find it bizarre that there is MORE than one police union, and that it membership appears to be linked to one’s ideological position?

    That’s creeepy, in my books.

    Anyway, all those youths - whatever happened to the land of Catherine Di Medici and her handling of Les Hugenots?

    Posted by Apparatchik on 2006 10 05 at 11:49 PM • permalink

  55. #51: El Cid, don’t forget, “the minkey”.

    Posted by paco on 2006 10 05 at 11:50 PM • permalink

  56. “And yes, that even counts for the French.”

    Correct, because at some point they are going to call in the Legion, the best unit in the French Army (because they are by and large not French), and have a history of kicking recalcitrant colonial asses, (and truth be said, getting kicked themselves when French political will gave out).

    Posted by Vanguard of the Commentariat on 2006 10 05 at 11:53 PM • permalink

  57. Having lived in Europe for 30 years, i can assure you that the will to fight back, to stand up for ‘liberte, equalite etc’ is way, way off.

    However, this guy

    may become mayor of Antwerp (it’s in Belgium) on Sunday.

    His main policies are
    i) stop benefits for jobless immigrants and
    ii) refuse to recognise Islam as an official religion

    Posted by pommygranate on 2006 10 06 at 12:16 AM • permalink

  58. #57 - I think it quite possible that Europe will do whatever is takes to reclaim what is theirs. Their culture. The Muslims better get used to it. This might take 50 years and civil wars the deaths of tens of thousands but eventually it will be My way or the highway.

    Posted by Bonmot on 2006 10 06 at 12:54 AM • permalink

  59. #18 À mon avis, la borne routière très menaçante n’a pas encore été atteinte.

    borne routière menaçante” is the translation you seek.

    Posted by MentalFloss on 2006 10 06 at 01:18 AM • permalink

  60. Oh yeah, and El Cid, here’s yours:

    مثل هذا حياة

    But remember,

    يتلقّى كلّ كلب يومه

    Posted by MentalFloss on 2006 10 06 at 01:21 AM • permalink

  61. #32 putting de cart before de horse again, eh?

    Posted by MentalFloss on 2006 10 06 at 01:53 AM • permalink

  62. My ex-flatmate told me the story once of how he had to flee Paris after he took a happy snap of a French anti-riot policeman breaking the jaw of a protestor with a club. He reckoned it was a superb action shot - the blood and teeth were flying and it made the front page but he had to evacuate fast - they did have a nasty reputation back then. Ransacked his flat of course but not him.

    Posted by rbresca on 2006 10 06 at 01:55 AM • permalink

  63. the fuck?

    Posted by CB on 2006 10 06 at 01:57 AM • permalink

  64. #60… as in what…

    Posted by CB on 2006 10 06 at 01:58 AM • permalink

  65. #59 #18
    If you listen carefully you can hear the pages of the well thumbed English to French Dictionary being turned… ssshhh

    Posted by Bonmot on 2006 10 06 at 01:58 AM • permalink

  66. tu peut baiser mon cul, bonmot.

    Posted by MentalFloss on 2006 10 06 at 02:04 AM • permalink

  67. Je n’ai pas besoin d’un dictionnaire pour vous indiquer que vous devriez fermer votre bouche.

    Posted by MentalFloss on 2006 10 06 at 02:07 AM • permalink

  68. #27

    This is surprising.  Beleive it or not, the French cops had a legendary reputation in the sixties and seventies for being ruthless on rioters.  The British leftists were terrified to cross the Channel for that reason.

    Looks like they’ve been girlified over the last two decades

    Have they? Or is the violence on the other side like nothing they’ve ever seen.

    Posted by Dan Lewis on 2006 10 06 at 02:15 AM • permalink

  69. #66 - only if you promise to enjoy it mate!

    Posted by Bonmot on 2006 10 06 at 02:19 AM • permalink

  70. #67 such sensitivity mate.
    My harmless little dig prompted quite a spray. I’m surprised. And yes most of us will refer to a dictionary if it is necessary to close an argument (or a mouth).

    Posted by Bonmot on 2006 10 06 at 02:28 AM • permalink

  71. #65 ff, Bonmot, you have inadvertently aroused MentalFloss’s curious hostility to the mention of dictionaries.
    It is also rather odd that he called me ‘annoying’ for making dictionary comments about meanings in English, yet he shows off his French here, rather pointlessly and insultingly too.

    Posted by Barrie on 2006 10 06 at 04:10 AM • permalink

  72. #71 - yes, thanks, it is curious. Some people have a very short wick (take that as you like) and instantly snarl if they perceive the slightest challenge to their fragile egos.

    Bit sad really. Especially when one has to flaunt one’s grasp of French in such an agressive manner.

    Obviously my name bon mot meaning witty remark in his beloved Froggy escaped him.

    Posted by Bonmot on 2006 10 06 at 05:03 AM • permalink

  73. When times are tough Europeans flee to the extremes, at his trial in Nuremburg Hermann Goering said a hundred years from know their will be a statue of me in every German home, the way the situation is developing in Europe i think there is a good chance the fat nazi bastard may be proved right.

    Posted by phillip on 2006 10 06 at 07:02 AM • permalink

  74. Me? Sensitive? Never.

    I addressed you in French with a bit of bite for fun and because, as you point out, you choose to present yourself here as “Bonmot”.

    Nothing “escapes me”.

    And, Barrie, you can well and truly kiss my ass if you object to a little French in a thread about the French.

    Supercilious git.

    Posted by MentalFloss on 2006 10 06 at 07:11 AM • permalink

  75. Anyone read John Stone’s article entitled
    “The Muslim problem and what to do about it”
    in the September edition of Quadrant?

    It should be compulsory reading for all Australians who don’t want this country to turn into a complete shit heap in 100 years time.

    Hey mental floss can you translate this into latin ?

    Islam -
    cornered by reason
    responding with violence

    To my mind it really seems to sum up the situation.  I’d love to stick it on a t shirt but if it was in English I fear that the semi - literate imbeciles would understand it and hasten to add further proof to the statement.

    Posted by Willow76 on 2006 10 06 at 07:50 AM • permalink

  76. No car should be driven in reverse at more than say 30km/h as they are just too unstable when the wheels that do the steering are at the wrong end of the car.

    You get lots of injured people when you fit a police car with a gearbox with 5 reverse gears.

    “Look, muslim rioters.  Flee! Flee!”.

    Crash.

    Posted by mr creosote on 2006 10 06 at 07:56 AM • permalink

  77. Ah, mes amis, come, let us do the reasonings together! Let us not be, how do you say, with the daggers drawn. Monsieur Floss is an erudite homme from whom we can all learn much, in any language. And the bon mots of, er, Bonmot are renowned for their attrait. Come, let us have a glass together.

    Posted by paco on 2006 10 06 at 08:14 AM • permalink

  78. Where is Charles Martel when you need him!

    Just when the Franks need “The Hammer” once again, they turn into hammers themselves, and I mean that in the derogatory sense of the word.

    Posted by Fragglerocker on 2006 10 06 at 08:44 AM • permalink

  79. I’m with MentalFloss !!

    Why? Dunno really. I gave up on that language when I very nearly failed the High School Junior Public Examination on it in 1969. Too many “oooo” noices for my liking in a foreign language. Fucking French pricks. I have never liked them.

    I guess I’m on his side because it kinda feels safer. I have an instinct for this sort of thing.

    Posted by geoff on 2006 10 06 at 09:20 AM • permalink

  80. 77 paco

    Ah, mes amis, come, let us do the reasonings together! Let us not be, how do you say, with the daggers drawn. Monsieur Floss is an erudite homme from whom we can all learn much, in any language. And the bon mots of, er, Bonmot are renowned for their attrait. Come, let us have a glass together.

    Absolutely correct. With the group in residence here, we shouldn’t have bleu on bleu, le feu.

    My glass is raised and if need be, we will raise it for the ruffled…salut!

    Posted by El Cid on 2006 10 06 at 09:28 AM • permalink

  81. O/T, but Little Green Footballs has some photos of that “massive” World Can’t Wait Protest that shook the Republic to its foundations yesterday. Interesting gallery of lower primates.

    Posted by paco on 2006 10 06 at 12:08 PM • permalink

  82. I’m trying to imagine how many “youths” would be left if 2500 American cops were wounded…

    Well Richard, I do know how the cops in America react to a cop-killer that refuses to surrender:

    Accused of killing deputy, suspect shot 68 times.

    To quote the Polk County Sherrif:

    “That’s all the bullets we had, or we would have shot him more,”

    Posted by David Crawford on 2006 10 06 at 02:24 PM • permalink

  83. “That’s all the bullets we had, or we would have shot him more,”

    What? They didn’t head back to the car for reloads?

    Posted by Rob Crawford on 2006 10 06 at 02:54 PM • permalink

  84. Accused of killing deputy, suspect shot 68 times.

    Obviously the Polk County Sheriff’s Department needs to up their budget for ammo.

    Posted by trainer on 2006 10 06 at 02:55 PM • permalink

  85. It occurs to me that reading the comments on this blog would sometimes lead one to think that America is still mired in the Wild Wild West.  Including comments of mine.

    It isn’t.  No country could operate as efficiently as the US does with blood in the streets.  And an armed society is tres poli, nes pas.

    It’s just, hmmm, we sort of expect our cops to do their jobs, and if they have to pop a cap on the occasional dirtbag we don’t really mind.  Just the appearance of overwhelming police force has stopped many a riot in it’s tracks.

    What you don’t hear about on this forum is the outrage when they screw up or crack up…as cops tend to do.  It is a very difficult line we walk to allow police to do their jobs without overdoing their jobs.

    It helps that mostly by the time the cops get there, the dirtbag is room temperature.

    Posted by trainer on 2006 10 06 at 03:22 PM • permalink

  86. #84 trainer

    Obviously the Polk County Sheriff’s Department needs to up their budget for ammo.

    Yeah. But look at the savings the county makes on the legal budget.

    Posted by geoff on 2006 10 06 at 05:30 PM • permalink

  87. Willow76, my Wheelock Latin Grammar (every one should have one) is about four up and three boxes back, but most of what you’ve typed consists of Latin roots (except, obviously “Islam”).

    I might make a few changes for effect, and because Latin lends itself to a more portenteous turn of phrase while adhering to “multum in parvo”, i.e. (lit.) “much in little”, ‘less is more’, ‘keep it simple, stupid’; etc.:

    “Trap a Muslim with reason, expect violence”
    Laqueus Muslimaea per ratio quod specto vis


    Cicero I ain’t, but I’d be inclined to replace “vis” with “extorqueum”, which has the extra connotation of violence as extortion. Also, because word order is meaningless in Latin, and one can do away with prepostions and such because of inflection in the nouns and verbs; I might phrase it so:

    Per ratio irretitus
    Muslimaea quoniam (becomes) vehemens

    or

    Muslimaea teneo tantum (knows only) extorqueo


    A bit lame, but it’s early morning and I’m still a bit fuzzy.

    Posted by MentalFloss on 2006 10 06 at 06:23 PM • permalink

  88. Oh, and I’ve no boeuf with bonmot. A little back and forth is fun.

    Barrie, on the other hand, well…as the Frenchman said after a hearty breakfast: “an oeuf is an oeuf”.

    Two years into a double major History/Latin and my Latin teacher dies of bone cancer, the university cancels the entire Latin program and I’m stuck with quickly finding a two-year accelerated course to replace it.

    Voila! French.

    (and I really do appreciate those who put up with me here, I’m not trying to show off, its just that Tim’s site has been a G-dsend for me. Twenty years in real-time control systems technology leaves little to satisfy the intellect. Thanks, Tim.)

    Posted by MentalFloss on 2006 10 06 at 06:40 PM • permalink

  89. #49, Amos:

    I agree fully. That is the primary reason I keep hollering for full total war against islam now. The longer this problem is allowed to sit and stew with half assed and “softly softly” measures, the closer we’ll come to genocide being the only answer left.

    I’d rather see the arab/muslim completely defeated and islam removed as a motivator to belligerence, rather than have the arab/muslim simply cease to exist as a people.

    Posted by Grimmy on 2006 10 06 at 07:13 PM • permalink

  90. Yeahhh! Hear that Barrie ya big stupid fart ruttin’ zoggin’ blathering blatherskite dork?

    [See that MF? Nifty hey? Good thing I’m on your side hey?]

    Posted by geoff on 2006 10 06 at 07:33 PM • permalink

  91. ubetcha, geoff—more enemies I don’t need!

    Posted by MentalFloss on 2006 10 06 at 08:09 PM • permalink

  92. LOL yeah. MentalFloss is one of those scary folk that can pin a body to the wall with facts and then flense its carcase with reasoning.

    The rest of us occasionally pitch in by providing the saltwater bath for the freshly skinned body to soak in.

    Posted by Grimmy on 2006 10 06 at 08:34 PM • permalink

  93. (and I really do appreciate those who put up with me here, I’m not trying to show off, its just that Tim’s site has been a G-dsend for me. Twenty years in real-time control systems technology leaves little to satisfy the intellect.

    I don’t think you show off.  You really truly have substance.  And gravitas.  I, for one, am fascinated by your considerable knowledge of Ancient History.  I look for your comments and those of many others here including paco (funny and clever), Rebecca (sweet), MarkL (brazen), Andrea (straight and unvarnished), and many many others.  As much as I enjoy Tim Blair’s humor and insight, I wouldn’t come here if it wasn’t for the commenters. 

    I especially say that with respect to Richard McEnroe.  Yes I recall you were listed at the top of the list of the members who have posted the most comments.  And it seems after that list was posted, your contributions went down considerably, possibly due to your thinking that maybe you’re posting too often.  I can say uncategorically that’s not true.  Your comments are excellent, humorous, and insightful, although at times a bit abusive towards the lower ranking members here.  * cough *  Please continue giving us those edgy comments that I so much enjoy.

    Posted by wronwright on 2006 10 06 at 08:43 PM • permalink

  94. #75

    Anyone read John Stone’s article entitled
    “The Muslim problem and what to do about it”
    in the September edition of Quadrant?

    It should be compulsory reading for all Australians who don’t want this country to turn into a complete shit heap in 100 years time.

    Here’s a link I prepared earlier.

    Posted by Dan Lewis on 2006 10 06 at 08:43 PM • permalink

  95. I’m with geoff. Buggered if I’d want to be on the wrong side of a verbal stoush with The Floss.

    Posted by Henry boy on 2006 10 06 at 08:46 PM • permalink

  96. #93 wronwright

    I especially say that with respect to Richard McEnroe.  Yes I recall you were listed at the top of the list of the members who have posted the most comments.  And it seems after that list was posted, your contributions went down considerably, possibly due to your thinking that maybe you’re posting too often.  I can say uncategorically that’s not true.  Your comments are excellent, humorous, and insightful…

    Amen.

    And may I say you too, good sir.

    BTW has anybody heard from Texas Bob? He’s starting to worry me.

    Posted by geoff on 2006 10 06 at 09:07 PM • permalink

  97. #93: Frankly, wron, since this is rapidly turning into old home week, and we’re passing the bottle around and getting a bit sappy, I might as well ask why you have reduced your comment pace? One of the things that immediately attracted me to this site, in addition to Tim’s posts, was the wonderfully imaginative, Rovian cyber-world behind which you seemed to be the moving spirit. Now, you don’t write, you don’t call; what the heck are you up to, buster?

    Posted by paco on 2006 10 06 at 09:48 PM • permalink

  98. #87: because Latin lends itself to a more portenteous turn of phrase

    Dear fellow, you meant portentous, surely? shoots cuffs and flicks an imaginary bit of lint from sleeve of tweed jacket with intellectual-looking elbow patches.

    Posted by paco on 2006 10 06 at 09:57 PM • permalink

  99. Nicolas Sarkozy, the interior minister, has said in today’s Telegraph that ““We are in a state of civil war, orchestrated by radical Islamists.”

    Posted by Ian Deans on 2006 10 06 at 10:08 PM • permalink

  100. #99: Good on him. If that cute libertarian chick doesn’t run for President, maybe Sarkozy will do.

    Posted by paco on 2006 10 06 at 10:18 PM • permalink

  101. A drop of Hunter Red then all round…. no vins francais served in this inn…

    glug glug… pours with unsteady hand. Name is bon mot, not steady eddy.

    slurp, slurp… ah, goes down smooth as mother’s milk. Few drop land on immaculate white lace tablecloth. Cest la vie…

    Anyone for a top up…..

    Posted by Bonmot on 2006 10 06 at 10:30 PM • permalink

  102. I ran a business in Vanuatu for twelve months some years ago and I’ve had my lifetime of dealings with the Frogs thanks.

    Posted by Bonmot on 2006 10 06 at 10:36 PM • permalink

  103. Poor Tentous!
    I knew him, Horatio. A man of infinite jest.

    Posted by blogstrop on 2006 10 06 at 10:36 PM • permalink

  104. The official reason paco?  Work.  I’m a tax attorney and I’m enmeshed in a very nasty audit.  As it is, I gave up reading Glenn Reynolds’ blog (which I miss) and Tim Dunlop’s (which I don’t).  The only thing that keeps my sanity is sipping Sumerian mead and reading a good detective novella.

    (sotto voce)

    Unofficially?  I’ve been chasing down Stoop Davy Dave.  Goat boy took Karl’s favorite satchel (Komono dragon hide, white rhino horn handle, gold inlaid, very nice), stuffed some oats and alfafa in it, and absonded with TARDIS II.  How do I know that?  I have him on the security camera, baa baa’ing, bobbing his head in joy, and grabbing the satchel in his teeth.  He also left a great big turd on Karl’s floor, which I had to clean up wouldn’t ya know.

    Well Karl ain’t happy.  Here, let me say that again.  Karl.  Is.  Not.  Happy.

    So I’m left with the back up TARDIS scouring the time periods looking for goatboy.  How do I expect to find him in eons of history?  Well, I ain’t stupid.  I’ve been at the library scouring the history books for any tales, real or mythological, that deals with a talking goat or goat-man.

    Do you know how many tales of goat-men there are?  Dozens.  Bacchus.  Dionysisus.  Lucifer, for crying out loud.  And then there’s other mythological beings that are half man, half animal.  The Minotaur.  Centaur.  The birdmen of Gor.  On and on.  I have to check them all out.  And mostly they’re not paco.  But they’re real live beasts.  With fangs.  And claws.  Some of them have snakes in their hair.  And they’re all hungry!

    But Karl wants his satchel.  And that means I got to get that damn infernal satchel back.  So ... 

    I’m off to 3000 BC China.  I have to check out a tale about a talking goat that supposedly ate out of Confuscius’ rice bowl, said BAAAAA, and shitted on the emperor’s saffron silk carpet.

    Posted by wronwright on 2006 10 06 at 10:40 PM • permalink

  105. #104: THAT’S M’BOY!!

    Posted by paco on 2006 10 06 at 10:43 PM • permalink

  106. wronwright
    I’m a tax attorney
    Yikes!
    Nasty audit
    Where’s the bathroom….

    Posted by Bonmot on 2006 10 06 at 10:59 PM • permalink

  107. Birdmen of GOR???

    Oh great W2, now you’re gonna have the feminists down on us!

    psst, I missed that one, can you lend me a copy?

    Posted by Vanguard of the Commentariat on 2006 10 06 at 11:23 PM • permalink

  108. Yyaahhhh!

    Now I remember how I got hooked on this blog!

    Posted by geoff on 2006 10 06 at 11:53 PM • permalink

  109. Great thread, especially the part where Miranda was completely ignored.

    Posted by Dave S. on 2006 10 06 at 11:55 PM • permalink

  110. “The French have a history of overthrowing govs that don’t follow the wishes of the people..”
    Well the people must have some pretty cowardly,self hating,U.S. hating,Western World hating wishes just sayin…

    Posted by crash on 2006 10 07 at 12:00 AM • permalink

  111. 27# so correct. Western nations have been so petrified by political correctness, they have no balls.
    Letting that mob into our worlds was a huge mistake, now you would need something mighty strong [like will power] to get them out.
    Or a backbone would do.

    Posted by waussie on 2006 10 07 at 12:39 AM • permalink

  112. # 103 ...and blogstrop gloves one neatly on the up and off go the bails…it’ll be a long walk back to the pavillion for the 12th man…out of his crease, barely troubled the scorers and he’s gone…maaahhvellous…

    #101 Over here, garkon. And a fine drop it is, too, that is served in good humour and quaffed in fellowship.

    # 98 Lint? Only recently were you held in high esteem and already The Tweed needs another cleaning?

    (...now I can’t get the picture of having a feminist down on me out of my head. Thanks, Van.)

    Posted by MentalFloss on 2006 10 07 at 12:47 AM • permalink

  113. #109 I didn’t even see Miranda. Must look in dark corners and see what’s skulking, I guess.

    Posted by Nilknarf Arbed on 2006 10 07 at 01:25 AM • permalink

  114. And in jolly old England the local Muslimes are calling the shots. http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006460631,00.html

    Posted by Howzat on 2006 10 07 at 02:17 AM • permalink

  115. Have French intellectuals perhaps been drained of their adrenalin by these frissons they keep getting?

    Posted by Henry boy on 2006 10 07 at 03:11 AM • permalink

  116. #115 - no, but they keep waking in the night because they’ve alouette the bed.

    Posted by blogstrop on 2006 10 07 at 03:55 AM • permalink

  117. Where’s Tim? Gone to see some cars burning around Mt Panoramadan?

    Posted by blogstrop on 2006 10 07 at 03:57 AM • permalink

  118. #30 Infidel Tiger

    I thought the riots were philosophy majors protesting that someone had flushed a copy of Descartes down the latrine. Live and learn I suppose.

    LOL. :-)

    I also think jokes like that are great for another reason.  Humour is a very effective way of revealing double-standards and hypocrisy.  It’s amazing the number of modern, trendy Western sophisticates who seem to think that people rioting over a Koran dropped in a gutter is legitimate, yet would be appalled if other groups tried the same excuse.

    Posted by ekb87 on 2006 10 07 at 04:39 AM • permalink

  119. That Quadrant article by John Stone is great.

    Thanks Willow76 (@ #75) for mentioning it, and Dan Lewis (@ #94) for linking it.

    It’s rare to see that much straight-talkin’, infliching common-sense in a single article.

    I recommend it to anyone who hasn’t already followed the link. (it is reasonably lengthy though).

    Posted by ekb87 on 2006 10 07 at 06:59 AM • permalink

  120. “Behold I Bring You Good Tidings of Joy”

    51

    From the MUNCH EASY thread below.

    Posted by El Cid on 2006 10 07 at 08:19 AM • permalink

  121. Thanks Dave S. I’m humbled to know that for you the best bit was where i was ignored. Says a lot mate and I really appreaciate it. Peace.

    Posted by Miranda Divide on 2006 10 07 at 08:44 AM • permalink

  122. #112: Imaginary lint; flicked for effect.

    Posted by paco on 2006 10 07 at 10:36 AM • permalink

  123. #104 WronWright

    You may have been slightly distracted, you should have checked out “Tarnsmen of GOR”; one-ring and all that.

    Cheers

    Posted by J.M. Heinrichs on 2006 10 07 at 01:30 PM • permalink

  124. OT: Paco, you read The Black Dahlia, by James Ellroy?  It has the “great zootsuit war” in Hollywood as an event.

    The book depresses me overall because one reviewer said it encapsulates how men really feel about women.  Apparently Islam’s view would be the norm in that case…

    Posted by ushie on 2006 10 07 at 01:40 PM • permalink

  125. Ushie:
    You shouldn’t read reviews composed by males of exquisite sensibility and circumscribed masculinity. You might find a less subjective account here.

    Cheers

    Posted by J.M. Heinrichs on 2006 10 07 at 03:14 PM • permalink

  126. Thanks, J.M.  Much less…off-putting, in spite of the graphic photos.

    Posted by ushie on 2006 10 07 at 04:40 PM • permalink

  127. #125 Ushie: I haven’t read Ellroy’s novel, but I have read The Black Dahlia Avenger, by Steve Hodel, a non-fiction investigation by a genuine former police officer whose conclusion concerning the guilty person is jaw-droppingly stunning (and brilliantly argued). Do get hold of it and read it; if it isn’t one of the most fscinating things you ever read, I’ll eat my hat (your choice of fur felt fedora or panama).

    Posted by paco on 2006 10 07 at 05:02 PM • permalink

  128. Paco, I’ll get it/order it at BAM ASAP.  I’ve already got Princes in the Tower on a 3-month backorder…

    Gawd, I hope Andrea doesn’t see all this OTness down here…

    Posted by ushie on 2006 10 07 at 06:11 PM • permalink

  129. Thanks Dave S. I’m humbled to know that for you the best bit was where i was ignored. Says a lot mate and I really appreaciate it. Peace.

    Miranda, the best bit for me (so far as you are concerned) EVER is this, thanks to the legendary Sortelli. 

    Especially with your little rant at the end of that long closed thread….which merely underscores the entire point of that short story, then and now.

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 10 07 at 09:51 PM • permalink

  130. #109 - Miranda said something?

    Posted by Achillea on 2006 10 08 at 02:19 AM • permalink

  131. Thanks “Real” Geoff, that was unreal. Great days huh? I remember with great fondness derailling post after post with the truth, showing up a fallacious argument here, destroying the comraderie that comes with shared bigotry online with a few carefully crafted words. You may be the blogsheep but I am surely the troll without equals.

    Aaah, 2004. When men were men and blogsheep had no need to be nervous, for they had the bloghead, lighting the way, fanning the flames of prejudice, drawing on his little glee club of minions to do the real dirty work. Here boys, go fetch the bigots bone!

    There can’t really be a decent buck in this caper. Who’s really backing this noble enterprise?

    Posted by Miranda Divide on 2006 10 08 at 05:20 PM • permalink

  132. I remember with great fondness derailling post after post with the truth, showing up a fallacious argument here, destroying the comraderie that comes with shared bigotry online with a few carefully crafted words.

    Funny, I remember you dribbling and barking something about “blogmire,” whatever that is supposed to be (Tim and I finally decided that you must be having problems with your drains in whatever hovel you lived in. I understand that those things can be traumatic.)

    Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2006 10 08 at 10:22 PM • permalink

  133. Yup.  Same old Miranda.  Too bad, I’d hoped for some improvement with age…...but this just ain’t sour grapes, it’s bad vinegar.

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 10 08 at 10:30 PM • permalink

  134. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.