<< CALL MADE ~ MAIN ~ SPACE HOG VOMIT THREAT >>

DEMOCRACY GONE WILD

“This is democracy on December 2, 2005,” writes apocalypse-minded Margo Kingston:

An Australian is hanged. The career of a would-be Prime Minister who made his name breaking union power in the Courts is in ruins. The IR legislation passes the Senate as a fierce and thunderous storm whips through Canberra. Drivers in a long line of white cars outside the Parliament’s Senate Entrance waiting to take the Senators away turn on their lights as rumours fly that the airport is closed. A tree uprooted by the storm falls in a nearby suburb, killing a man.

Right. Let’s work through this ...

* The hanging of Nguyen Tuong Van has nothing to do with Australian democracy, just as the executions in Malaysia of Kevin Barlow and Brian Chambers nineteen years ago—when a Labor government was in power—were nothing to do with Australian democracy.

* Peter Costello has blundered spectacularly, but his career is far from ruined.

* A “fierce and thunderous storm” on the east coast also has little to do with the democratic process, and in fact may help drought-ravaged Australia produce one of its largest grain hauls since 1995.

* Weather-related airport closures, or rumours thereof, are not influenced by voter behaviour.

* It is unlikely that any part of the Australian democratic system was involved in the death of a man struck by a falling tree. Well, maybe not; after all, according to Webdiary commenter Damian Lataan:

Howard is a liar whose lies have resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent people.

And now he’s killing people with trees! Oddly, Margo neglected to mention Australian democracy’s complicity in the vicious slaying of Popsicle.

UPDATE. Alan Ramsey hits a Margoesque note:

Nguyen Tuong Van went to his death. John Howard went to the cricket. Kim Beazley went to church. Rob Gerard went into exile. A day in the life of politics. Business as usual. The Prime Minister excused his cricket attendance on the basis of his “hosting duties”. Singapore’s hangman could have said the same thing. An embittered friend emailed: “As you often observe, God help us all.”

That paragraph means absolutely nothing.

UPDATE II. Margo explains her ridiculous piece:

The headline quotes Ron Boswell during the IR debate wrap. The first paragraph is a list some things that happened on the day. That’s all.

Posted by Tim B. on 12/02/2005 at 11:45 AM
  1. Australian democracy responsible for uprooted trees! Surely Margo doesnt even believe this fiction! Howard responsible for tooth decay and athletes foot, too?

    Posted by debi L. on 2005 12 02 at 01:20 PM • permalink

  2. Howard lied, chihuahuas died!

    Posted by paco on 2005 12 02 at 01:54 PM • permalink

  3. What’s wrong with chihuahuas dying?  Yappy little mutts! 

    No yappy, John!

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2005 12 02 at 02:19 PM • permalink

  4. #3: Absolutely nothing wrong with it. My comment should have been read in the same tone used by the captain of the guard in the Wizard of Oz: “She’s dead; you’ve killed her! Long live Dorothy!”

    Posted by paco on 2005 12 02 at 02:35 PM • permalink

  5. Hurricane => Global Warming => George Bush.

    She’s blaming the wrong person.

    => is the symbol for “solely caused by”.

    Posted by Rob Read on 2005 12 02 at 02:39 PM • permalink

  6. Applogies for my last post, I used the now deprecated phrase “Global Warming”.  I forgot that in order to double the number of grant funding requests occasioned by summer and winter, it is now termed “Climate Change”.

    Posted by Rob Read on 2005 12 02 at 02:40 PM • permalink

  7. So you’re telling Margo to get uprooted?

    Posted by andycanuck on 2005 12 02 at 03:00 PM • permalink

  8. I think she needs to be sprayed for bagworms.

    Posted by paco on 2005 12 02 at 03:07 PM • permalink

  9. When are people going to learn?  Democracy doesn’t work!

    Posted by TimShell on 2005 12 02 at 03:16 PM • permalink

  10. Yeah. That storm last night was a doozy. Wronright and Iowahawk job well done. You fine gentlemen should have parked your black helicopters somewhere and called in for a beer. I’m sure you probably had other assignments to fulfil, other catastrophies to inflict, storms to cause and lakes to steal.
    Maybe next time.

    Posted by Hank Reardon on 2005 12 02 at 03:37 PM • permalink

  11. Tim, how can you be so blind?  These truly are the final days…

    Or, it could be the influence of MoDo.

    Posted by Mystery Meat on 2005 12 02 at 03:50 PM • permalink

  12. Paco, #4:  Maybe someone could throw a bucket of water on Elisa Roberts…..?

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2005 12 02 at 03:58 PM • permalink

  13. Her writing skills evoke those of Edward Bulwer-Lytton, he of the phrase “it was a dark and stormy night…”

    Posted by Dr Alice on 2005 12 02 at 04:29 PM • permalink

  14. So, if a tree falls in the forest and no one’s around, is that still democracy’s fault?

    Posted by Sortelli on 2005 12 02 at 04:50 PM • permalink

  15. On a serious note (someone throw a bucket of water on me) the next year or two will be an interesting time here. The left/ALP are planning to rebound on the back of the IR legislation but for the first time they will encounter a critical mass of opposition that is historically informed and economically literate. Bill Hutt  will become a household name in the offensive line that will push Chris Shiel and his team off the ball every time they get into a scrum.

    Posted by Rafe on 2005 12 02 at 04:52 PM • permalink

  16. Don’t know about the Chihuahuas, but webdairy has 101 Damian Lataan types.

    Posted by blogstrop on 2005 12 02 at 04:58 PM • permalink

  17. So, if a tree falls in the forest and no one’s around, is that still democracy’s fault?
    No, it is that bloody butterfly in the Amazon again!

    Posted by blogstrop on 2005 12 02 at 05:00 PM • permalink

  18. Cats and dogs living together !
    MASS HYSTERIA !!!

    Posted by guinsPen on 2005 12 02 at 05:15 PM • permalink

  19. #12: I think we ought to splash water everywhere and melt ‘em all (though I seem to recollect, vaguely, that moving large quantities of water is the responsibility of one of the Rovers, either wronwright or McEnroe).

    Posted by paco on 2005 12 02 at 05:38 PM • permalink

  20. I would say that Margo Kingston is your Maureen Dowd except that Dowd has some talent at writing. Margo is truly a numbingly bad writer. And that is not taking into account her inability to analyse. She can’t reason and she can’t write, and she looks like an Easter Island monolith. What more could one country hope for? She’s the trifecta of bad political commentary.

    Posted by ekw on 2005 12 02 at 05:45 PM • permalink

  21. o/t by about 15 threads:
    Hey Dave S!  Hey Barrie!
    I finally snapped outta my stupor and retorted to Barrie’s vile besmirchment of the libertarian escutcheon, over on the “Column Wears Hat, Rhinestones” thread, but now nobody’s reading it any more!  What should I do?

    Posted by Stoop Davy Dave on 2005 12 02 at 05:57 PM • permalink

  22. Isn’t it suspicious that you never see Margo and MoDo in the same place at the same time?  I mean besides the “fact” that they live in different hemispheres, a misleading trifle to the acute and logical mind.  Based on their similar nonthinking inabilities, I’ll bet they are the same person.  Now you know why Margo had to take all those “vacations”.  That was when she was doing her MoDo alter ego.

    Posted by Michael Lonie on 2005 12 02 at 06:02 PM • permalink

  23. Lear and his Fool wandering forlorn on the heath…  Wait!  Wrong narrative!

    Posted by Pixy Misa on 2005 12 02 at 07:10 PM • permalink

  24. She has the ability to treat the english langage like a 5 yerar old kid with a magnifying glass over an ant hole.
    Wisps of smoke spiral upowards as the nouns are singed, agonised squealing fronm the verbs which have been only half fried.
    Entertaining but just so wrong.
    (This is my entry in the 2005 tourtured analogy competition).

    Posted by thefrollickingmole on 2005 12 02 at 07:30 PM • permalink

  25. Yes, yes, we all know weather-related airport closings have nothing to do with democracy, but what about that long line of white cars?!?

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2005 12 02 at 07:37 PM • permalink

  26. Hey Dave S!  Hey Barrie!
    I finally snapped outta my stupor and retorted to Barrie’s vile besmirchment of the libertarian escutcheon, over on the “Column Wears Hat, Rhinestones” thread, but now nobody’s reading it any more!  What should I do?

    ‘Tis the tragedy of the rolling threads - sometimes our bon mots will linger for eternity unread in the Blair Archives. One must accept it, sadly.

    Posted by Dave S. on 2005 12 02 at 07:48 PM • permalink

  27. The upside is, you can save it for a future thread. I’m sure kip will eventually give you cause to whip it out. Errr…

    Posted by Dave S. on 2005 12 02 at 07:50 PM • permalink

  28. Well, now I feel better about that time in college when I was ready to get in on with a chick who was so incredibly smoking hot that I got intimidated and couldn’t get it up. Turns out it wasn’t my problem at all.

    DAMN YOU, 2005 AUSTRALIAN DEMOCRACY!

    Posted by Dave S. on 2005 12 02 at 07:57 PM • permalink

  29. MoDo was on Letterman the other night. Click here to watch her espouse some truly remarkable horse-shit.

    “Two words Dave, Cheney’s. Guilty”
    Sounds of muted applause, trailing off in background.

    Posted by CB on 2005 12 02 at 08:02 PM • permalink

  30. Omens. What Margo needs is more omens.

    Two-headed babies born, statues crying, eagles flying west at dawn. Omens!

    Posted by Evil Pundit on 2005 12 02 at 09:06 PM • permalink

  31. I know this is somewhat off-topic but in light of quoting stupid things people say I’m hoping that Tim might see fit to have and end-of-the-year “Stupidest Quote of the Year” award.

    I know by rights Margo should have a lock on the honor hands down but for my money the stupidest quote of the year (and maybe the decade) has to be from Age editor Andrew Jaspan regarding Douglas Wood:

    “The issue really is largely, speaking as I understand it, he was treated well there. He says he was fed every day, and as such to turn around and use that kind of language I think is just insensitive.”

    Posted by kcom on 2005 12 02 at 09:34 PM • permalink

  32. Anybody got Ramsey’s email address. The man’s a complete dick. Almost as mad as Margolia and that tiresome, rancid old Shepherd woman.

    Posted by Gravelly on 2005 12 02 at 10:03 PM • permalink

  33. O/T but the perth festival in association with various Unis in WA, and sponsering from the lotteries commision is showing that wonderfull movie “Paradise now”.
    /gag.spew

    Posted by thefrollickingmole on 2005 12 02 at 10:06 PM • permalink

  34. I am truly disturbed by the extremism displayed by Margok and Shit-for-Brains Ramsey in this case, but I guess in a democracy they can get away with it.
    On a positive note, I applaud Downer calling Robert Rectum, QC a ‘creep’ and the Libs and Nats in Queensland walking out of Parliament as that flog Beattie tried to undo 90 years of history by having a minute’s silence to a dead criminal.

    Posted by AlphaMikeFoxtrot on 2005 12 02 at 10:20 PM • permalink

  35. #31 kcom, I think we have a new contender for Stupidest Quote Of The Year: Robert Richter.

    “Changi is a place that resonates in the Australian psyche ... we remember Changi for the unspeakable horrors that happened there under Japanese occupation.

    “But what happened at Changi this morning is more shameful and worse,” he said.

    Posted by Evil Pundit on 2005 12 02 at 10:29 PM • permalink

  36. Unhappy Ramsey + Unhappy Margo = Ha Ha!

    Posted by Lucky Nutsacks on 2005 12 02 at 10:44 PM • permalink

  37. o/t the age is running this piece of loony lefty arty farty fluff - can we get some rwdbs down to st kilda to ridicule the failed university lecturer & designer who dreamed this up?

    fluff

    what the article doesn’t say is which benighted group of taxpayers is footing the bill

    Mr Redman says Mr Lansell’s enthusiasm has given him an interest in the planets and astronomy generally, but working on the project has mostly deepened his appreciation for the vulnerability and fragility of our planet. “It’s all about the here and now, this is humanity’s one shot,” he says.
    The planets, which will be on metal stands to allow children to look up at them, will be on display between 2pm and 8pm on two consecutive weekends — December 10 and 11 and December 17 and 18.

    The pair want their art to be available to others to reproduce it. The first example of replicator art on their website is the ingenious marshmallow TV, an invention of Mr Lansell’s. Mr Redman describes it as the “lava lamp of the new millennium”.

    Posted by KK on 2005 12 02 at 10:45 PM • permalink

  38. Some days more than others, timblair.net feels like an island of sanity in an ocean of barking moonbat madness. This is definitely one of those days.
    But ekw #20 - what did the Easter Island monoliths ever do to you to deserve that sort of abuse?

    Posted by SwinishCapitalist on 2005 12 02 at 11:26 PM • permalink

  39. That Margoyle piece that was the literary equivalent of a Leunig cartoon - nonsensical, inept and sub-adolescent in its directionless & pointless disaffection.

    Posted by Jim Geones on 2005 12 03 at 12:33 AM • permalink

  40. But wait, there’s more!

    Dear Leader Margo has now started emulating Stalin by airbrushing dissidents out of existence.

    Posted by Evil Pundit on 2005 12 03 at 12:36 AM • permalink

  41. #20 ekw, I’ll pay that! LOL!


    (Oh, and thanks to those who answered my question about RSS. I’m still a bit confused, but not as much. Ta!)

    Posted by Nilknarf Arbed on 2005 12 03 at 12:41 AM • permalink

  42. Chihuahuas

    Is that like a little tiny Cthulhu that humps your ankle with its tentacles?*

    And hey, if Bush can inflict hurricanes on the defenseless blacks of New Orleans, surely John Howard can close one lousy airport.

    *or to put it in Lovecraftian prose: “an Achillean embrace at once serpentine anf formless, indescribable in its inchoate complexity that entwined itself in the very roots of my tortured sanity…”

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 12 03 at 12:58 AM • permalink

  43. blogstrop — Shows you how fried I am tonite that I saw “chihuahua” and read “cthulhu”... Iä! Iä!...

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 12 03 at 02:05 AM • permalink

  44. “a little tiny Cthulhu that humps your ankle with its tentacles”

    Another item for my Christmas wish list!

    Posted by Evil Pundit on 2005 12 03 at 02:33 AM • permalink

  45. Hmmm, Chuthulu, Rove, GWB, missing lakes, what could the connection be…..

    Posted by thefrollickingmole on 2005 12 03 at 02:34 AM • permalink

  46. Only a demented mind like Mango’s can extract political mileage from an uprooted tree.

    Posted by rog on 2005 12 03 at 04:11 AM • permalink

  47. EP,  If you source them in Australia lt me know.  I can relive my youth with something like that.

    Posted by KevGillett on 2005 12 03 at 04:14 AM • permalink

  48. #30 EP - actually I think that’s exactly what happened in a Douglas Admas book; one of the Dirk Gently ‘series’.  Oh, maybe not exactly that - I think there was the bit where Thor got pissed-off at the airlines, blew up the airport lounge and turned the check-in lady into a Coke machine.  Still, that’s not too far off the mark from your suggestions and from Margo’s summation of events in Canberra.

    Seriously - when a senior journalist has to add commentary to explain a heading, and explain the purpose (or not) and context of the text already published:  that’s no longer funny, that’s pathetic.

    Posted by Ck on 2005 12 03 at 04:23 AM • permalink

  49. Richard - I think the Chuthulu is the African branch of the family - you need to keep them fenced in - they are always rwandering off.

    Posted by blogstrop on 2005 12 03 at 06:26 AM • permalink

  50. Roberto -Changi is a place the Abc turned into a musical comedy…
    Matt Price also commented on the relationship between the storm and Howard’s legislation.
    In a separate article he equated the executed Van Nguyen with Saddam Hussein.Whatever Van’s faults in no way could you call him a hands on ,deliberate genocidal torturer war criminal but Price says Howard is a HYPOCRITE for not worrying about Hussein’s possible death sentence.Different case anyway when the defendent is Iraqi and is sentenced by Iraqis or a sentence is carried out by Iraqis.

    Posted by crash on 2005 12 03 at 09:25 AM • permalink

  51. Hello Cthulhu

    Posted by Dave S. on 2005 12 03 at 09:33 AM • permalink

  52. #10 Yeah. That storm last night was a doozy. Wronright and Iowahawk job well done. You fine gentlemen should have parked your black helicopters somewhere and called in for a beer. I’m sure you probably had other assignments to fulfil, other catastrophies to inflict, storms to cause and lakes to steal. Maybe next time.

    I’m not drinking a beer anywhere close to Iowahawk.  (curls index fingers in a wriggly fashion)  All he did was boss me around.  “Do that wronwright.  No, not like that you featherbrain.  Like McEnroe does it”.  He refuses to lift a finger to help.  Apparently, he’s an “idea man”.

    My god, don’t we have enough “idea men” in this evil cult benevolent organization?  We need men of action.  No, make that Men of Action!  (—> note to self:  apply for copyright on term, sue the shit out of anyone who uses it)

    (please note that Men of Action includes women of action too.  And people that are somewhere in between.  We’re evil but we’re sensitively inclusive also)

    Posted by wronwright on 2005 12 03 at 10:49 AM • permalink

  53. Sentient Beings of Action?

    Posted by PW on 2005 12 03 at 12:05 PM • permalink

  54. Action Man? You’ll be hearing from the trademark lawyers, wronwright.  Our Dark Master says you’re on your own with that one.  After what they put Open Source Media/Pajamas Media/Occupant through…

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 12 03 at 02:07 PM • permalink

  55. Tim already linked this in a subsequent post, but I think we have definitive proof that Cthulhu knows no gender.  Literally.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2005 12 03 at 03:17 PM • permalink

  56. #55 - looks like Margo’s doing some mighty fine hectoring there…

    Posted by Dave S. on 2005 12 03 at 03:29 PM • permalink

  57. RebeccaH — That’s an insult to eldritch molluscs anywhere…

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 12 03 at 03:56 PM • permalink

  58. That paragraph from Margo is like a scene out of Exorcist II: The Heretic... with the original, really bad ending…

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 12 03 at 05:30 PM • permalink

  59. Speaking of Cthulhu, remember that stirring challenge:

    Cuthulhu for President.  Why settle for the lesser evil?

    It should come in handy in 2008.

    Posted by Michael Lonie on 2005 12 03 at 06:57 PM • permalink

  60. No, not Action Man.  Men of Action.  I might also copyright Neocon of Action. 

    Maybe just neocon too.  Maybe I can get some dough out of the webdiarists and Daily Kossacks when they do they rants against Bush and Cheney.

    Posted by wronwright on 2005 12 04 at 05:07 AM • permalink

  61. I’m still waiting for MoveOn.org’s “Bush = Cthulhu” ad campaign. 

    And I wouldn’t be at all surprised to learn Chihuahas were created by some evil force, stupid, foul-tempered, yappy little vermin that they are.

    Posted by Achillea on 2005 12 04 at 03:35 PM • permalink

  62. Hey, Stoop. I hope you find this. To understand me at all you need to distinguish between moral libertarians and political ones. The Clintons are a moral libertine subset of libertarianism, except for say the death penalty. Political liberals may be a mixture of each -usually are - while being statist economically [so they’re really confused, like most marxists were.]

    Liberal as a political party can mean anything - from very conservative on anything to very statist, to very anti-statist.

    HTH ;)

    Posted by Barrie on 2005 12 04 at 08:59 PM • permalink

  63. I forgot to add that, logically, libertarians are simply anarchists with a nicer label.

    Posted by Barrie on 2005 12 04 at 09:02 PM • permalink

  64. Mr just-making-shit-up-now

    Hey, Stoop. I hope you find this. To understand me at all you need to distinguish between moral libertarians and political ones. The Clintons are a moral libertine subset of libertarianism,

    No.  Wrong.  Irrelevant.  Nongermane.  Ridiculous.  The Clintons are NOT small-l libertarians, are not big-L Libertarians, and are not nor have ever been any kind of subset OF libertarians.  Never and none, not even by mistake, not even with the stretchiest definitions.  The Clintons don’t call themselves libertarians, and NO libertarian has ever called the Clintons libertarians.  Explaining libertarianism in terms of the Clintons is ... hm ... it’s like studying Egyptology by setting up a telescope and photographing the rings of Jupiter.  That’s a simile, not a metaphor; and they are liberals, not libertarians.  Dictionaries, look into them.

    Posted by Stoop Davy Dave on 2005 12 04 at 11:06 PM • permalink

  65. I forgot to add that, logically Christians are simply Muslims with a cuter supernatural mascot.

    Posted by Stoop Davy Dave on 2005 12 05 at 12:42 PM • permalink

  66. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.