<< OPEN OSCARS THREAD ~ MAIN ~ ACADEMY WARNED >>

MAX ATTACKS

To its credit, this time around the ALP is running its novelty candidate in a marginal seat:

Former ABC journalist Maxine McKew will run against Prime Minister John Howard in the seat of Bennelong at the next federal election.

Ms McKew joined the ALP recently and is working for Labor leader Kevin Rudd. Mr Howard’s seat is marginal and Ms McKew would need a swing of around 4 per cent to win it. She says Labor needs to claim those sorts of seats if it is to win Government.

Ex-Labor minister Gary Punch told ABC radio this morning that McKew would win due to demographic changes in Howard’s seat. “They hate him,” Punch claimed, speaking of the area’s Asian residents. We’ll see.

Posted by Tim B. on 02/25/2007 at 09:07 PM
  1. Two words:

    Mary Delahunty.

    You’d think the brains trusts in the ALP would learn about the inadvisability of putting a talking head up. Rarely works.  Look at Mary Poppins in the UK!

    Posted by walterplinge on 2007 02 25 at 09:22 PM • permalink

  2. Last time it was that Iraq intelligence guy. He was going to win.

    Posted by Pericles on 2007 02 25 at 09:25 PM • permalink

  3. Joined Labor recently?!

    Didn’t she work at the ABC for about 50 years?

    Posted by DaneF on 2007 02 25 at 09:28 PM • permalink

  4. She’s got the Doctor’s wives vote sewn up.

    Posted by boxofmatches on 2007 02 25 at 09:30 PM • permalink

  5. Maxine was previously offered a safe seat in Cabramatta or Liverpool but turned it down cos she didn’t want to move from Mosman. As Latham noted in his diaries:

    “So Maxine wants to be a Labor MP, but can’t stand the sight or smell of Labor voters, hey?”

    Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 02 25 at 09:31 PM • permalink

  6. “Ms McKew joined the ALP recently”

    Give us a freaking break!!!

    Posted by Gravelly on 2007 02 25 at 09:39 PM • permalink

  7. Fran Kelly was running the ‘Asians won’t vote for Howard’ meme on Radio National this morning.  Presumably that ABC-logic is that Howard will be spurned by Asians because, as we all know, he’s a racist.  I would have thought that the Asian community, being hard-headed, realistic, self-advancing, prosperity-oriented people, would be a natural coalition bloc.

    Posted by cuckoo on 2007 02 25 at 09:41 PM • permalink

  8. I have it on good authority she slept her way into the job.

    Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 02 25 at 09:41 PM • permalink

  9. Stand by for unparalleled lemon-sucking.

    Posted by SwinishCapitalist on 2007 02 25 at 09:42 PM • permalink

  10. And, as I noted on another comment thread, Maxine has already passed one test of ALP luvvie-dom, on Radio National this morning, by referring to herself in the third person.  She calls her bid a ‘new definition of underdog’.  I would have said ‘of chutzpah’.

    Posted by cuckoo on 2007 02 25 at 09:45 PM • permalink

  11. I live in the seat and it was unbearable when the traitor Wilkie ran for the Greens last election. This year is going to be the worst!

    Posted by ozconservative on 2007 02 25 at 10:03 PM • permalink

  12. What’s the betting on The Hoglet out-polling Wee Willie Wilkie? I’m thinking about opening a book, if I can get any mug punters.

    (I note also that Wee Willie is still looking to immerse his snout in the trough of public largesse and carbon consumption hypocrisy, scoring the no.2 spot for the Greens in Tasmania behind Bob Brown*. I’d rather not think about what sort of casting couch was required, but given Bob’s particulalrly demented utterances of late I’d say Willie’s destined for the dole, and well-deserved obscurity).

    *That’s my definition of a safe seat.

    Posted by Habib on 2007 02 25 at 10:04 PM • permalink

  13. #8
    In her role as Mrs Boss Hogg?

    #10
    She’s been quoted in ABC Ruddio National News sound bites as “doing it for Australia” and “doing it for Kevin Rudd” ... so self-effacing ...

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 25 at 10:10 PM • permalink

  14. #8

    Surely someone who sleeps with a union official deserves some kind of compensation.

    Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 02 25 at 10:16 PM • permalink

  15. Has anyone from the (extortion funded) ABC ever tried to become an MP for any party opposed to socialist slavery?

    Posted by Rob Read on 2007 02 25 at 10:17 PM • permalink

  16. #14

    A shot of penicillin.

    Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 02 25 at 10:17 PM • permalink

  17. #10
    a new definition of under-Hogg ...?

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 25 at 10:22 PM • permalink

  18. #15 The ever popular Eoin Cameron. Can’t think of any others

    Posted by 2BarRiff on 2007 02 25 at 10:22 PM • permalink

  19. “They hate him,” Punch claimed ...

    “Hate him, hate him, hate him!”, as sound engineers turned down his mic to prevent the foot-stomping from making it on the air.

    Posted by PW on 2007 02 25 at 10:29 PM • permalink

  20. Says Wayne Swan: More high profile candidates for Labor.

    Who’s next? Bert Newton, a Wiggle?

    Posted by C.L. on 2007 02 25 at 10:34 PM • permalink

  21. “They hate him,” Punch claimed, speaking of the area’s Asian residents.

    Bullshit they hate him! Most of those “Asians” are small business operators or self employed. Nearly as many Koreans in Eastwood as Seoul. All driving around in nice cars. Very well heeled. And they’re going to take a shine to an ex-ABC Labor stooge? Yeah, right!

    And Punch reckons ‘they hate him’. Yeah, right! Tell that to Judy!

    Posted by Bonmot on 2007 02 25 at 10:41 PM • permalink

  22. She could interview herself.

    Will she stand or sit for meet the press?

    Posted by 1.618 on 2007 02 25 at 10:45 PM • permalink

  23. Michelle Grattan puff-piece on Lindsay Tanner, December 2006:

    He delights too, in being a social commentator. In the Sydney [Institute] speech he noted, among threats to parties such as Labor around the world, an international trend to “entertainment politics”.

    “The faultlines between left and right have blurred, and politics has drifted into the world of entertainment. We now have celebrities becoming candidates and candidates becoming celebrities: being famous for being famous is becoming an important qualification for political office … parties now seek out celebrities as candidates.”

    Posted by C.L. on 2007 02 25 at 10:49 PM • permalink

  24. oh, I forgot VOTE 1 manoobs habib

    Posted by 1.618 on 2007 02 25 at 10:53 PM • permalink

  25. I will have the pleasure of voting in the Benelong electorate in the next election.

    Posted by anthony_r on 2007 02 25 at 10:54 PM • permalink

  26. When does the Max Hogg pork-barrelling commence?

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 25 at 10:54 PM • permalink

  27. #20

    The Wiggles will be unavailable as they are starting their own political movement

    Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 02 25 at 10:58 PM • permalink

  28. If you want a handle for this contest may I suggest JoHo vs MaxMc.

    Posted by anthony_r on 2007 02 25 at 11:11 PM • permalink

  29. According to an article in the Daily Telegraph:

    “I’m nominating for the seat of Bennelong because I want to make whatever contribution I can to help bring about a change of government,” Ms McKew said.

    One wonders if she held that goal during her time at the ABC immediately prior.

    If so, is she also one of those who will insist the ABC is unbiased?

    Posted by Dan Lewis on 2007 02 25 at 11:11 PM • permalink

  30. What evidence do the ALP have that “Asians” hate Howard?

    #15, #18 - Pru Goward’s another; if she gets up come the next NSW election, that is. However these people are definitely in the minority amongst the ABC-hack-turned-pollie brigade.

    Posted by James Waterton on 2007 02 25 at 11:13 PM • permalink

  31. #25, err make that Bennelong.

    Posted by anthony_r on 2007 02 25 at 11:14 PM • permalink

  32. #28
    Maxative vs The John?

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 25 at 11:16 PM • permalink

  33. Here, the Labor Party is showing its spite, cynicism and arrogance.  Kevin Rudd obviously believes that Labor can’t win unless John Howard is first eliminated.

    One thing’s for sure - the ABC will give her a very easy run.  John Howard will only get a look in if he makes a mistake, even a very minor one.

    I trust the residents of the Benelong electorate won’t be fooled. Gary Punch certainly is.

    Posted by ann j on 2007 02 25 at 11:22 PM • permalink

  34. McKew exhibited a complete lack of depth in her work at the ABC. Her style was to ask the scripted question and not understand the answer so then be unable to ask a serious follow up question.

    I’m sure that when she’s interviewed on specific topics she’ll be about as unimpressive as Peter Garrett.

    Posted by Jack Lacton on 2007 02 25 at 11:42 PM • permalink

  35. The ALP’s fondness for running ludicrous novelty candidates in Bennelong, election after election, makes them strangely reminiscent of the Official Raving Monster Loony Party.

    Posted by cuckoo on 2007 02 25 at 11:49 PM • permalink

  36. if the ALP’s understanding of the bennalong electorate is that teh asian community will not vote for Howard, they will not win the seat.  On the other hand, if they were to traget the ‘doctor’s wives’, they more than likely to do a bit better.  I am sure maxine can appeal to that group, who of course, like maxine would not be caught dead west of eastwood.

    That said, I thought Andrew Wilkie and a host of other protest candidates already had that lot at the last election.

    Anyway, I think some will vote for Howard this time as they would not want to be so mean as to sack him.  Howard is no Keating, after all.  There is no desire among the general community to whack him with a baseball bat.

    Posted by entropy on 2007 02 25 at 11:59 PM • permalink

  37. #36
    This brash act could cause a backlash to the Rudder from the general electorate, been waiting for him to fall on this feathersword ...

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 26 at 12:06 AM • permalink

  38. McHogg could turn out to be a masterstroke for Rudd. The ultimate stalking horse.

    SCENARIO 1  
    The plan could be that he spends so much time on the federal election he neglects Bennelong and McHogg takes his seat.

    SCENARIO 2  
    She is a high profile distraction - Howard takes the bait and spends so much time defending Bennelong, he loses focus on the bigger picture, loses the election but holds his seat.

    Either scenario, Rudd wins. Howard is a spent force regardless. McHogg will be a Labor hero no matter what.

    This is serious and no laughing matter.

    Posted by Bonmot on 2007 02 26 at 12:29 AM • permalink

  39. #38
    The populace has the lead-up to the election to see this for what it is - attempting to rob them of their PM, regardless if the Libs are returned to power: the swinging voters may see this for the crass act it is, KRuddy beginning to expose his mean, nasty character

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 26 at 12:40 AM • permalink

  40. It would be big news if Rudd turined out to be some sort of double agent. Hope he is on Australia’s side!

    Posted by Pericles on 2007 02 26 at 12:40 AM • permalink

  41. I think everyone is placing far too much vote attraction on the concept of “celebrity”, especially in the case of one who would only be known to people who are already true believers anyway- it’s not as if she’s ever been on “Dancing With The Stars”; also given her tallyroom pouts, family connections and the fact that she’s got to flog her gaff in Mosman to move into the electorate, it would be a doddle to paint her as a longterm party hack, and what’s more one who has misused her position in a public-funded broadcaster to advance her (and her hubbys) agenda and political ambitions.

    I’d say JWH is more at risk of contracting an infestation of candiru’ than getting rolled by Makka- a national 4% swing is difficult to achieve at anytime, but during a time of low unemployment, low interest rates and national prosperity? Dream on- luvviedom is more delusional than when the One Pod Sod crawled out of the Werriwa swamp and ran amok.

    Posted by Habib on 2007 02 26 at 01:05 AM • permalink

  42. #41
    Poll popularity is not enough to win elections ... KRuddy would have to win individual seats, as Latham found out ...

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 26 at 01:22 AM • permalink

  43. Maxie goet plenty of air time on News Radio early this morning. No ten-second soundbite for her, they played the whole Q&A session and fairly dull listening it was, especially the second time around.

    Posted by SwinishCapitalist on 2007 02 26 at 01:44 AM • permalink

  44. Tsk. Disappointing to see the ‘caring’ party speak of Asians as ‘they’, i.e, a homogenous bloc. I wonder what would have been said had it been the Libs making a similar comment?

    As if being partial to the odd bowl of rice makes people all think alike.

    Posted by Nic on 2007 02 26 at 01:48 AM • permalink

  45. 16 or 17 of ‘em as well, unheard of except when the incumbent has proven to be a blithering idiot, overseeing a cabinet which seems to be full of gibbons on crstal meth:-...... Besides, the next election hurdle is a high one for Labor – it has to win an extra 16 seats to govern. On a uniform swing, this would require Labor to increase its vote after preferences by 4.9 per cent, compared with the 2.2 per cent it needed in the last election. Labor has achieved a larger two-party preferred swing in federal elections only once since 1949: Whitlam’s 6.9 per cent against John Gorton in 1969. Beazley came close with a 4.6 per cent swing against Howard in 1998. But neither was large enough to put Labor into office. Only the Coalition has achieved larger winning swings – Malcolm Fraser’s 7.4 per cent against Whitlam in 1975 and Howard’s 5.1 per cent against Keating in 1996.

    (From Mike Steketee - The Australian, 2005 when bomber was still around). 

    The hammering they got last time pretty much makes government impossible unless JWH takes up sniffing glue, Costello is sprung
    en flagrente’ delecto with barnyard animals, Tony Abbott likewise with a choirboy and Nick Michin watches a dvd of
    The Motorcycle Diaries and commences sniping at incoming comcars from the roof of parliament house; the worst scenario I can see is the loss of control of the Senate, which isn’t much of a one as they’ve done fuck-all with it (unless it goes to the Greens).

    It all seems like Groundhog Day, 2004.

    Posted by Habib on 2007 02 26 at 01:59 AM • permalink

  46. #28
    Those from Bennelong who don’t watch ‘Our ABC’:

    Maxine McWho?

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 26 at 02:21 AM • permalink

  47. I looked closely at the map of Bennelong to figure out where Maxine might reside if she is serious about all of this. For those of you who don’t know the area it basically follows the river to the west of Sydney.  In Sydney as you move west you lower your prestige. Not to say these aren’t all nice, liveable suburbs but the Eastern boundary of this electorate would be too low on the social totem pole for Maxine and the west end…forget it.

    Posted by allan on 2007 02 26 at 02:37 AM • permalink

  48. #47- Ooo, it is AWFULLY middle class, and lower at that; perhaps she could suffer Epping for a bit, or Chatswood (ugh) West at a pinch, but Ryde and Gladesville for heavens sake! Where does one find real brie’ at 10pm in those plebian backwaters?

    I’d rate Mad Max definately a lower chance than Wee Willie, who probably had a higher meeja profile.

    Posted by Habib on 2007 02 26 at 02:48 AM • permalink

  49. Bolt: Defeat for the Howard government “increasingly likely”.

    Posted by C.L. on 2007 02 26 at 02:49 AM • permalink

  50. This is serious and no laughing matter.

    I agree Bonmot; McKew is a bit more than a ‘novelty candidate’ and electoral redistributions have put more of Labor’s natural constituency (yes, it still exists) in to Bennelong.  A distraction that Howard doesn’t need this year.

    ps the miscreant Wilkie is running for Senate for the the Greens here in Tas this year - joining Bob Brown-eye.

    Posted by Stop Continental Drift! on 2007 02 26 at 03:17 AM • permalink


  51. Says Wayne Swan: More high profile candidates for Labor.

    The Labor party must be working through the ABC news and current affairs department’s phone directory. As for a new mansion for Maxine, the SMH has recently launched Adoreproperty.com to help her. It deals exclusively with the exclusive suburbs of Sydney. There is nothing that appeals more to a socialist politician than an elite address where they don’t have to actually speak to the people they claim to represent.

    Posted by Contrail on 2007 02 26 at 04:03 AM • permalink

  52. #51,
    If Rudd gets in, Costello’s Future Fund is history.

    Posted by chrisgo on 2007 02 26 at 04:05 AM • permalink

  53. Hanson announces election bid

    Too had she’s not going for the Reps in KRuddy’s seat.

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 26 at 04:08 AM • permalink

  54. #54
    BTW no mention at all on Our Pravda Online News as yet, despite the newspaper link quoting a conversation with ABC Radio ...

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 26 at 04:17 AM • permalink

  55. Bennelong isn’t as marginal as Labor thinks.  While some Labor voting areas have been added, the Meadowbank area has become quite “aspirational” in recent years, and may well start swinging to the right.

    Posted by 2dogs on 2007 02 26 at 04:20 AM • permalink

  56. #47 The map explains it all now. I always thought Howard’s electorate was more Upper North Shore. This map explains Punch’s Hanson-like reference to the amorphous “Asians”. Do Labor seriously think they’ll go for Maxine?

    Posted by AlburyShifton on 2007 02 26 at 04:27 AM • permalink

  57. The Rudds ( more specifically Mrs Rudd ) are not burdened with Latham’s ‘class warrior’ tag and so are more attractive to the “aspirationals”

    Posted by chrisgo on 2007 02 26 at 04:29 AM • permalink

  58. #56
    Bennelong is very middleclass, as it is near a decent water body (few Sydneysiders can afford harbour views, this is the next best thing) and aspirational; a lot of whitecollar jobs are moving to the Chatswood/North Ryde area: a case of Labor swallowing too much of their own bullshit, if they think that this is “Struggle Street”, pffft!

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 26 at 04:38 AM • permalink

  59. Perhaps Punch was thinking of the Asians from that part of Asia known as the Middle East.

    Posted by Skeeter on 2007 02 26 at 04:54 AM • permalink

  60. Maxine says she is ‘redefining what it means to be the underdog’. A rich-bitch moving from one high class suburb to another 10 minutes away, having her face on TV for over 20 years at tax-payers expense and hubby is a Labor heavyweight. Max, the Spartans at Thermopylae you ain’t!

    Posted by AlphaMikeFoxtrot on 2007 02 26 at 04:56 AM • permalink

  61. 1929 (pre Liberal Party) was the only? time a PM lost his seat - prolly cos the constituents also don’t want to lose the prestige of having the PM as their member ...

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 26 at 05:37 AM • permalink

  62. #62 And Viscount Bruce was essentially being punished for attempting to dismantle the Federal arbitration system.

    #49 I should add that I think the Bolta knows the lefty nyer-nyer brigade will target him for ridicule if Howard loses so he’s indulging in a bit of pre-emptive nonchalance and prudential I-saw-it-comingism. Qua journalist, this is understandable; qua advocate for a series of causes in which he claims to believe, it’s a smidgen weak.

    Posted by C.L. on 2007 02 26 at 05:52 AM • permalink

  63. maybe the real story is that Kruddy and the hacks couln’t find an electorate to parachute the hogget into

    Posted by hooligan on 2007 02 26 at 06:08 AM • permalink

  64. It’s not unusual for both parties to field a potential MP in an unwinnable seat first-up. Not only does it mean easy pre-selection but it gives the candidate a chance show what he/she can do - gives them a profile with the electorate in general and with the party. When a winnable seat comes up the party can pre-select them for that.

    If the candidate is genuinely strong, e.g., Messrs Garrett and Turnbull, they can go straight to a safe seat.

    The conclusion I draw is that McKew is seen by the ALP as potentially another Delahunty (and judging by her vapid public remarks, probably so) so she is being blooded in an unwinnable seat. The plan seems to be merely to distract Mr Howard from campaigning nationally.

    It would all the same be a delight to see a Howard/McKew debate. Nothing like a good bloodbath.

    Posted by walterplinge on 2007 02 26 at 06:59 AM • permalink

  65. Maxine joins the McKew of Hate John. Which ABC ‘star’ will be next?

    Posted by stackja1945 on 2007 02 26 at 07:13 AM • permalink

  66. Bruce went to London and kept WSC under control for Curtin.

    Posted by stackja1945 on 2007 02 26 at 07:15 AM • permalink

  67. Rod Henshaw ran for the seat of Dickson in Queensland against Cheryl Kernot and failed by only a handful of votes to beat her. He was an ABC early morning radio presenter.

    I once heard him say “I’m one of the few men in Australia who can say that they nearly knocked her off.”

    Posted by amortiser on 2007 02 26 at 07:53 AM • permalink

  68. As much as you can generalise, I am sure that the portion of the Asian community that are small businesses would certainly welcome the dead hand of the Swot Womble’s union dominated economics team.

    Posted by boxofmatches on 2007 02 26 at 07:59 AM • permalink

  69. This is serious and no laughing matter.
    I have to agree.
    Kevni gets to put a shot on JoHo directly. He could pick up a lot of soft votes if people believe Howard could lose his seat.  Create enough belief throughout the rest of the country that voting for John Howard may not get actually get you John Howard because Maxine is on the case.
    The average punter in Eden-Monaro probably couldn’t pick the former ALP publicist ABC journalist out of a police line-up, but thanks to all the moist gussets in the MSM, Maxine’s name recognition beyond the 7:30 Report/Lateline set has never been better.

    Posted by lotocoti on 2007 02 26 at 08:23 AM • permalink

  70. Maxine isn’t really so bad for a blonde. She’s certainly gotten blonder as she’s gotten older, considering we were both brunettes when we started work at the ABC. I’m still a brunette BTW, as I believe it keeps one’s brain cells intact.

    Posted by mareeS on 2007 02 26 at 08:36 AM • permalink

  71. I find the whole thing highly unethical.
    She should have declared her political affiliations whilst hosting the ABC program.
    Now she declares “because I want to make whatever contribution I can to help bring about a change of government”.
    with such views how can one conduct “unbiased news reporting”? Such dishonesty must be fully exposed.

    Posted by davo on 2007 02 26 at 09:35 AM • permalink

  72. Well, Maxine has the following blocks filled:
    > Friends of the ABC
    > Doctor’s wives
    > Book club members
    > Wimmen
    > Global warming cultists

    Posted by boxofmatches on 2007 02 26 at 09:47 AM • permalink

  73. I reckon, quite seriously, Janette should be all over the seat campaigning while John is in election mode. Its all hands on deck.

    Posted by boxofmatches on 2007 02 26 at 09:49 AM • permalink

  74. Personally, I think JWH will treat this flapdoodle with the same regard as the bugger with his middle name coped with like candidates.

    Anyone like to name one?

    Posted by Habib on 2007 02 26 at 10:00 AM • permalink

  75. demographic changes in Howard’s seat

    Does that mean his butt is getting smaller or soemthing?

    Posted by Major John on 2007 02 26 at 04:13 PM • permalink

  76. I have it on good authority she slept her way into the job.

    Don’t they all?

    Posted by Kyda Sylvester on 2007 02 26 at 06:25 PM • permalink

  77. Great! This is it! I’ve been waiting two hours for this. It’s a revolution!
    Blood runs! Flags wave! Come on, everybody, throw down your tools and knock down the barricade. Come on, run into the Winter Palace. Run into the Winter Palace and stand on tables, waving bits of paper at each other! Yes! Yes!! Hello, are you the Czar?!
    Bam bam! Tough luck, fascist!!
    That’s what happens to people who aren’t working class! Rise up and seize control of the state! I can see it now. Hordes of asians running up with pitchfolks and torches to burn the Woolwich Pier Hotel. Brilliant! Revolution!

    Posted by ratman on 2007 02 26 at 07:04 PM • permalink

  78. #65
    The thought occurred, but to put a high profile canditate in the PM’s seat comes across as agressive and could easily backfire against the ALP as a whole; now that Kruddy’s being tarnished with Brian Bourke, it could be the start of his slippery slope (he’s prolly got plenty of enemies in his own camp).

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 03 01 at 07:08 PM • permalink

  79. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.