<< TURKEY ROLL ~ MAIN ~ PEACEKEEPERS FERTILE, ABUSIVE, INJURED >>
PHOTOSHOP DIET
Katie Couric gets the reverse Reuters treatment, whereby an image is made to look better.
It’s not just her waist that’s been reduced, it’s also her face. And her neck. And her arms.
Posted by Blithering Bunny on 2006 08 30 at 12:28 PM • permalinkHey, don’t knock Photoshop; it’s why I now look like this.
I dunno, I could use a diet like that. ;-P
Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 08 30 at 01:29 PM • permalinkExcept that I wouldn’t look like a robot, of course!
Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 08 30 at 01:29 PM • permalinkpaco might…...but I already resemble Cary Grant, except for the slightly larger waistline. ;-P
Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 08 30 at 03:43 PM • permalinkpaco, when I clicked on your link, I got a pair of shiny, sequined man-bags. You photoshopped yourself to look like a man-bag? WTF? Are you trying to cuddle up to Lowenstein?
Posted by JorgXMcKie on 2006 08 30 at 04:51 PM • permalinkBy God, that’s a scary set of choppers. When they squeezed her waist in, do you think twin jets of selzer water squirted out of either side of her teeth?
Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2006 08 30 at 05:01 PM • permalinkThe whole image has just been squeezed horizontally, have a look at the background. This sort of thing is apparently the norm in the (particularly womens’) print media.
Personally I reckon our Aussie queen of grotesque facial manipulation is Tracy Grimshaw. I’m sure there’s been a side of beef injected into each revolting lip.
Posted by russell2pi on 2006 08 30 at 05:58 PM • permalinkKatie is a beauty in any shape, it’s unfortunate that Publishers re-shape her to suit their publications image etc….
Also, don’t be dumb, don’t smoke.
Re: Tracy Grimshaw is lovely, HOWEVER, who ever is her stylist needs to re-think Tracy’s outfits she matches the background and there is no shape to her suits.
I don’t see what the issue is here. From day one, Katie Couric was known as a talentless, clueless, thoughtless idiot and had no value other than a “pretty” face.
She was an overt and upfront “ratings” choice.
So, since she’s little more than a biological manikin, why not make her at least appear presentable?
Paco won’t want you to see this, but here’s a snapshot of him at work in his office.
I looked and I looked at that picture of Perky Katie and I still can’t see where the Israeli missile hit!
Posted by Vanguard of the Commentariat on 2006 08 30 at 09:22 PM • permalink
Page 1 of 1 pages
Members:
Login | Register
| Member List
After Perky Katie basically admitted that CBS was going to continue to spin the news (“we’ll tell you what it means”), I guess the real test of whether or not the blogosphere is having an effect on “truthiness” will be seen in her ratings….