<< MODO REWRITTEN ~ MAIN ~ BULLDOZERS UNOPPOSED >>

PM TIM

According to Yahoo News, I’ve been ruling Britain since April 2004:

British prime minister Tim Blair to prepare MPs for worse violence in Iraq in coming weeks ...

I believe my aggressive stance on Iraq helped me be re-elected. William Kristol agrees:

So it turns out Madrid was the exception, not the rule. On March 14, 2004, the party of Spanish prime minister José María Aznar was defeated at the polls after an al Qaeda attack in Madrid and after a campaign in which the opposition fiercely criticized Aznar for Spain’s involvement in the war to remove Saddam Hussein. In the wake of its electoral victory, the new leftist government withdrew Spain’s troops from Iraq.

The question, a year ago, was this: Was Spain a harbinger of electoral defeat for the other democratic leaders of the war to liberate Iraq? Some hoped it would be, and have been severely disappointed. President Bush did not flinch in Iraq and was reelected with a stronger showing than four years before. Australia’s John Howard, a steadfast supporter of the war in Iraq, was reelected to a historic fourth term as prime minister with an increased majority. And last week Britain’s Tony Blair won a third term, the first Labour prime minister ever to do so.

Blair won with a diminished majority, to be sure. Yet the main opposition party, the Tories, supported the war as well. So roughly 68 percent of the British electorate voted for parties with pro-war leaders. The Liberal Democrats, critics of the war who pledged a quick withdrawal from Iraq, did increase their vote by about 4 percentage points, but still received only 22 percent of the vote.

Those losers! Must dash; my Galloway garrotting legislation is being drafted.

(Via Alan R.M. Jones)

Posted by Tim B. on 05/08/2005 at 11:13 AM
  1. Tim-You’re simply a ubiquitous bloke.

    Posted by yojimbo on 2005 05 08 at 12:21 PM • permalink

  2. Tim — Shtum, shtum… remember the words of Our Dark Master Rove: “the power behind the throne is the power…”

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 05 08 at 12:29 PM • permalink

  3. Tim:

    Oh My God…I had no idea. Here we are conversing with the Prime Minister of Great Britain. Who’d a thunk it.

    Anyway… I did hear that the ingrate MP’s might be planning to kick Blair [the real Blair] out of office.

    I hope not. It took real courage for him to stand by his principles. I am no socialist and I don’t agree with everything he does but Tony Blair has been one of the most effective and important PM’s in modern British history. If they give him the bum’s rush it will only send a message to all future PM’s that they must always err on the side of not doing anything anywhere anytime.

    Posted by terryelee on 2005 05 08 at 12:40 PM • permalink

  4. I’ve never liked Tony Blair, but doing what you know to be right, repercussions be damned is a rare quality in our day and age.

    Posted by Aging Gamer on 2005 05 08 at 12:56 PM • permalink

  5. Tim, that’s great news. 10 Downing Street sounds like a wonderful place for a blogfest. I’ll bet you have an excellent wine cellar, too.

    Posted by ErnieG on 2005 05 08 at 01:38 PM • permalink

  6. All right! England’s a lot closer than Australia.

    Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2005 05 08 at 02:08 PM • permalink

  7. I know I voted for you.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2005 05 08 at 02:56 PM • permalink

  8. Tim,

    Rule wisely.

    Posted by JayC on 2005 05 08 at 04:56 PM • permalink

  9. The lash, an iron fist and a whiff of grape is what they need, sir.

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 05 08 at 06:09 PM • permalink

  10. my Galloway garrotting legislation is being drafted.

    Can’t we bring back burning-at-the-stake just this one time Mr. Prime Minister?

    Lord Arty

    Posted by Arty on 2005 05 08 at 06:25 PM • permalink

  11. Arty — I’m thinkin’ four draft horses and chains…

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 05 08 at 06:35 PM • permalink

  12. Four draft horses and chains.  Mmmm-snap, crackle and….POP!  I’d pay to see that!  Maybe it could be combined with the beer bust.  Work on that Tim.

    Posted by yojimbo on 2005 05 08 at 06:50 PM • permalink

  13. Ah, it would have to be done Respectfully, of course.

    Posted by yojimbo on 2005 05 08 at 06:53 PM • permalink

  14. Never would have figured you for Labour, Tim. You’re doing a bang-up job on the foreign policy piece, though, so keep up the good work. And see what you can do about restoring the Stuarts; the Windsors are like a soap opera with an ugly cast.

    Posted by paco on 2005 05 08 at 09:25 PM • permalink

  15. Paco - be carefull what you wish for.  A European and UN approved Stuart is ready.  Looks a little like Andrew Denton.

    Posted by noir on 2005 05 08 at 09:44 PM • permalink

  16. Noir (and Tim): consider the request cancelled. Didn’t know the head of the family looked like a barn owl.

    Posted by paco on 2005 05 08 at 10:09 PM • permalink

  17. Oh, yeah, I’d charge a Challenger tank for that wet-eyed wonder…  I can just see John Keegan writing about it now:

    “The Second Battle of Culloden was notable principally for its brevity…”

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 05 08 at 10:57 PM • permalink

  18. You could bring back the Hanoverians, then you’d get this gal as your Queen…

    Posted by Quentin George on 2005 05 09 at 02:42 AM • permalink

  19. When you are as pretty as Grace Kelly was, the odds are that your genetic material will be in demand. Caroline is no slouch either.

    Posted by blogstrop on 2005 05 09 at 07:25 AM • permalink

  20. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.