<< PSYCHO CHILLER ~ MAIN ~ LONG TIME BETWEEN NOW AND THE ELECTION >>

POINTLESS JOB ABANDONED

Gentle-natured papal critic Amanda Marcotte has resigned from her role as Official John Edwards Blogger #1. I blame Iowahawk.

Posted by Tim B. on 02/13/2007 at 01:34 AM
  1. Had to resign before they gave the filthy trollop the arse.

    Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 02 13 at 01:48 AM • permalink

  2. Yeah, well, I blame Iowahawk too. And why do I have this sudden urge to pull out my Derek and Clive LPs?

    Posted by SwinishCapitalist on 2007 02 13 at 01:50 AM • permalink

  3. #1 I hope no gentleman gives ‘the filthy trollop the arse’ - who knows where Marcotte has been and what she’s carrying.

    —Nora

    Posted by The Thin Man Returns on 2007 02 13 at 01:54 AM • permalink

  4. Has he got someone to listen to his iPod for him?

    Posted by ilibcc on 2007 02 13 at 01:55 AM • permalink

  5. She has gone to work for Mark Latham.

    Posted by gubbaboy on 2007 02 13 at 02:06 AM • permalink

  6. I hope John Edwards doesn’t have a pet rabbit.

    Posted by cuckoo on 2007 02 13 at 02:10 AM • permalink

  7. She plans to spend more time with the family she doesn’t have because the patriarchy can’t tell her what to do with her body.

    Posted by Jim Treacher on 2007 02 13 at 02:23 AM • permalink

  8. Godbag Reich-wing Noise Machine ( 1 )
    Hormonal cat lovin’ tourettes womyn ( 0 )

    Posted by Squiffy on 2007 02 13 at 02:46 AM • permalink

  9. You @$%$#%) gonna fire me? I $%^#$@# quit, you $#%%&*@@$%% holes.

    Posted by BJM on 2007 02 13 at 03:15 AM • permalink

  10. #7 JT

    There’s nothing quite like a genetic dead-end, to teach the patriarchy a lesson.

    Posted by Thomas on 2007 02 13 at 03:31 AM • permalink

  11. Extra special type of Darwin Award.

    Thank you, Amanda, for making the right choice and letting your line end with yourself.

    Posted by Grimmy on 2007 02 13 at 03:36 AM • permalink

  12. If I were Edwards, I’d declare myself pro-life just to make sure she’d stay “resigned.”

    I’d probably get a restraining order, too.

    Posted by Ernst Blofeld on 2007 02 13 at 03:42 AM • permalink

  13. I blame Iowahawk.

    So where is that “bad boy”, anyway? Out on the town, celebrating his new position as a “well-financed right-wing shill”?

    Posted by Spiny Norman on 2007 02 13 at 03:48 AM • permalink

  14. O/T but Amanda is a blogger and I brought up my own little blog starting yesterday, Kerplunk, which, along with some help from the good people here, has racked up 222 unique visitors accessing 312 pages in just its first 24 hours since I commented on it here and elsewhere.

    That must put me in range of overtaking our moonbat friend, Antony Loewenstein, surely?

    Posted by Jack Lacton on 2007 02 13 at 03:57 AM • permalink

  15. I’m sure John Edwards will sorely miss his favourite “cum-guzzling booze-hound” (as she’s described herself). I mean, how do you think she got hired?

    Posted by morbo on 2007 02 13 at 04:53 AM • permalink

  16. All cum-guzzling booze-hounds are grey in the dark.
    (old chinese proverb)

    Posted by blogstrop on 2007 02 13 at 05:32 AM • permalink

  17. genetic dead-end

    Hey! I resemble that remark.

    Posted by Jim Treacher on 2007 02 13 at 05:43 AM • permalink

  18. “Gentle-natured papal critic”....

    Drink Warning next time, please, Tim. Nasally sprayed Earl Grey is so difficult to clean off the keyboard.

    Posted by Zoe Brain on 2007 02 13 at 05:54 AM • permalink

  19. Tsk, tsk. I told her not to stray from her perfectly acceptable Jew-bashing rants, but did she listen to me? Noooo. Catholic bashing went out after Kennedy was elected.
    Judeo-Christian bashing: OK
    Targeting Catholics specifically: Not OK

    Oh well, I’m sure there are plenty of other opportunities for a person with her previously mentioned qualities and skill sets.

    Posted by Texas Bob on 2007 02 13 at 05:58 AM • permalink

  20. My Golden Rule as a Catholic is to support any person’s right to make criticisms of - even deranged assaults on - Catholicism.

    Having said that, I also believe Catholics have a right to point out the weaknesses, absurdities, lies and distortions of their enemies - and to do so quite ruthlessly in defence of the truth. Some people seem to be of the view that Catholics should “turn the other cheek” and not fight back - as though allowing evil caricatures and untruths to endure is something other than detrimental to the power of charity and love between all people of faith (or no faith at all). Sorry Ms Marcotte, but Bill O’Donohue fought the good fight here and he deserved to prevail.

    People can read Ms Marcotte’s announcement of her richly deserved ouster here. She plays all the liberal Victimology 101 classics in a tendentious attempt to elicit sympathy and righteous rage from her dopey readership: the gender card, the pro-abortion card, the persecuted atheist card etc etc.

    To throw the uninformed and ignorant off the scent of her own vile anti-Catholicism, she also touts a supportive letter “from an organisation I adore called Catholics for a Free Choice.” She fails to mention - mendacious hack that she is - that this organisation has no status at all within the Catholic Church and has been condemned as fraudulent by the Catholic bishops of the United States of America.

    Posted by C.L. on 2007 02 13 at 05:59 AM • permalink

  21. That would actually be Mayfair Blogger, after the installers of the Mayfair Window and Door Company.

    Posted by rhhardin on 2007 02 13 at 06:20 AM • permalink

  22. #20-
    Gee C.L., next you’ll be saying that Bryan Law’s Christian peace Group isnt really a Christian group.
    I. Am. Shocked.

    Posted by Squiffy on 2007 02 13 at 06:21 AM • permalink

  23. #22 I don’t know anything about Bryan Law.

    The salient point is this: Catholics for a Free Choice is an organisation often wheeled out by anti-Catholics when they’re looking to shield their hatred of the Catholic Church behind faux support for the Catholic “rank and file”.

    For example, when I argued last year at far left moonbat site, Larvatus Prodeo, that “There are no Catholic women’s groups advocating the removal of the Church’s teaching on the subject [of abortion]”, one of my interlocutors triumphantly linked to Catholics for a Free Choice.

    Catholics for a Free Choice trades in what its organisers know is a confusing denominational fraud. Their intention is precisely to be cited as a mainstream organisation representing Catholic laity.

    Mr Law is entitled to use the more generic adjective “Christian” for his organisation, though I have no doubt that it too is fraudulent - but theologically, not denominationally.

    Posted by C.L. on 2007 02 13 at 07:02 AM • permalink

  24. Heh!  I do believe Ms. Marcotte has sunk his campaign before it really got underway.  In his spare time John Edwards could write a new book:  Lessons in politics:  How to piss off Catholics and nutroots in one move

    Posted by Not My Problem on 2007 02 13 at 08:04 AM • permalink

  25. I hadn’t seen that second Iowahawk link before. That was funny. “My Fair Blogger”, if you haven’t read it, treat yourself.

    Posted by moptop on 2007 02 13 at 08:16 AM • permalink

  26. “I don’t have a conflict of interest issue anymore that was preventing me from defending myself against these baseless accusations. So it’s on.”

    One of my favorite South Parks,

    “You’ve been served.”
    “So?”
    “it’s on”

    Posted by moptop on 2007 02 13 at 08:20 AM • permalink

  27. “Obviously, I’m scatterbrained…”—Amanda Marcotte

    Yeah, we noticed.

    Posted by Dave Surls on 2007 02 13 at 08:29 AM • permalink

  28. F***! F***ing shame really, I was so looking forward to a rousing f***ing campaign. I mean f***, the American campaigns are so f***ing boring.

    Don’t worry Amanda, I’m fairly f***ing certain your income, will f***ing increase because of the f***ing notoriety garnered.

    Posted by El Cid on 2007 02 13 at 09:15 AM • permalink

  29. Iowahawk for prime minister President !

    Posted by Harry Bergeron on 2007 02 13 at 10:07 AM • permalink

  30. If anyone wants a larger discussion group on Amanda Marcotte and her insane ramblings (plus leftie feedback, not all of it the usual trollish response), check out Protein Wisdom

    I must note that PW (the site, not our German commenter) tends to be blunt and (at times) vulgar, but there are excellent discussions concerning this deranged person.

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2007 02 13 at 11:02 AM • permalink

  31. I have beheld the Godbag, err.., Godhead that is Iowahawk and tremble least his wrath be incurred.

    Seriously, could that guy be any fucking funnier? I don’t fucking think so.

    Posted by joe bagadonuts on 2007 02 13 at 11:03 AM • permalink

  32. It’s over, babe…now you’re just another foul-mouthed lefty, and I can’t swing a cat without hitting three of those…

    LOL—ain’t it the truth.

    I love how they’ve made Bill Donohue part and parcel of the VRWC, the right wing “attack machine”. Donohue is president of the Catholic League, a anti-defamation organization. He takes issue with Marcotte’s very public anti-Catholic rants, not her personally held beliefs. I’m sure on a good many issues, Donohue is every bit as “progressive” as his detractors.

    Posted by Kyda Sylvester on 2007 02 13 at 12:09 PM • permalink

  33. ROFL, Iowahawk (you too, Treacher), but I don’t think even ‘enry ‘iggins could make a silk purse out of that sow.

    Posted by Kyda Sylvester on 2007 02 13 at 12:19 PM • permalink

  34. You guys obviously don’t understand satire. She was being satirical all that time, and she’s being satirical now when she says she wasn’t being satirical. Get it?

    Posted by Jim Treacher on 2007 02 13 at 12:22 PM • permalink

  35. I expect the lovely Miss Marcotte resigned after John Edwards (and three of his largest, meanest-looking bodyguards) explained the situation and asked her nicely if she’d be willing, or else.

    I don’t think Catholics should take her rants personally.  She strikes me as the kind of person who hates just about everybody who ever walked.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2007 02 13 at 12:33 PM • permalink

  36. Treacher, you’re being satirical….right? 

    ;-p

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2007 02 13 at 02:07 PM • permalink

  37. I was hoping Amanda would’ve lasted a little longer in the media spotlight. She sure was entertaining—in the way that a car crash is a spectacle of shocking proportions from which you cannot avert your eyes.

    And then there’s that whole sunlight being the best disinfectant analogy—watching the left twist themslves into pretzels explaining away Amanda’s rants would’ve been terrific comedy.

    Posted by Forbes on 2007 02 13 at 02:50 PM • permalink

  38. Man oh man, we all should have left well enough alone.  The restraints are off, and she’s gonna really get ugly now.

    We’ll be sorry we made her mad.

    Posted by Steve Skubinna on 2007 02 13 at 06:45 PM • permalink

  39. We’ll be sorry we made her mad.

    I don’t think it’s really possible to die laughing.

    Posted by Jim Treacher on 2007 02 14 at 12:43 AM • permalink

  40. Iowahawk now has sweet-talkin’ Amanda’s resume online.

    I almost did die laughing.

    That guy cracks me up.

    Posted by Dave Surls on 2007 02 14 at 02:34 AM • permalink

  41. “She strikes me as the kind of person who hates just about everybody who ever walked.”

    “I wish I wasn’t a cum-guzzling boozehound.”—Amanda Marcotte

    Sounds like she’s fairly friendly when she’s had a snort or two.

    Posted by Dave Surls on 2007 02 14 at 03:13 AM • permalink

  42. ... and they laughed when I claimed there really were redneck hillbilly intellectuals in Iowa.

    Posted by Henry boy on 2007 02 14 at 04:28 AM • permalink

  43. I feel sorry for her parents. Can you see them at Thanksgiving?  “Give her the gravy before she gets angry again!”

    Posted by Patricia on 2007 02 14 at 04:51 PM • permalink

  44. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.