<< INTOLERANCE MAPPED ~ MAIN ~ ASSUMPTION CORRECT >>

REALITY BESPOKEN

Soon it will be impossible to ridicule these people, seeing as they do such a fine job of it themselves. Here’s Professor Juan Cole:

The story of the interlibrary loan request for Mao’s Little Red Book that produced an interview by the Department of Homeland Security turns out to be a hoax.

However, it is one of those hoaxes that bespeaks a reality ...

Strange, as reader chrisbg99 observes, that the same logic isn’t applied to pre-war WMD claims. Didn’t that “hoax” also “bespeak a reality”?

Posted by Tim B. on 12/25/2005 at 01:33 PM
  1. If things were really as totalitarian and Cole and his ilk like to think, they would all be in jail or dead.

    Posted by Mystery Meat on 2005 12 25 at 03:13 PM • permalink

  2. The delay made the book overdue and the government refused to reimburse the guy for the fine.

    You heard it here first.

    Bespeakers bureau.

    Posted by rhhardin on 2005 12 25 at 03:44 PM • permalink

  3. Well, and Instapundit has a story mocking Daily Kos—whose real name, I think, is Kos “Kos” Kosziga or something—for not being able to afford a house in hyperregulated, hypertaxed, market-force-impaired San Francisco (or as locals call it, “Kosco”).

    Oh Lord, please grant me this one thing: that Kos moves somewhere, buys property and has a child.  The becoming a Republican who resents high taxes and unresponsive government bureaucracies part will take care of itself.

    Posted by Mike G on 2005 12 25 at 05:17 PM • permalink

  4. Mikeg—it doesn’t work like that.  Kos would be the kind of asshole “neighbor” who spends his days suing the school district over its nativity creche and taking out injunctions against folks who trytomove in after him…

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 12 25 at 05:30 PM • permalink

  5. Here in Upstate New York, we had a hoax that bespoke a reality. It was actually from this hoax that the expression, “There’s a sucker born every minute”, derived. Dig it, Juan.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardiff_Giant

    Posted by JDB on 2005 12 25 at 05:56 PM • permalink

  6. Professor Forrest said wealthy, better-educated areas of northern Sydney were quite tolerant and inner-city areas highly tolerant

    Surprisingly, these are the (only) areas where the SMH sells. Wouldn’t do to call the readers racist would it?

    Posted by Arnie on 2005 12 25 at 06:09 PM • permalink

  7. #6, sorry wrong story.

    Posted by Arnie on 2005 12 25 at 06:10 PM • permalink

  8. Fake but accurate, as they say.

    Posted by Scott R on 2005 12 25 at 06:14 PM • permalink

  9. However, it is one of those hoaxes that bespeaks a reality ...

    So that’s what they mean by “reality-based community”.

    Posted by PW on 2005 12 25 at 06:17 PM • permalink

  10. For the love of God, Senor Cole!! It’s BESPEAK!!! This hoax is “one of those hoaxes”—i.e. it is part of a set. That set consists of all hoaxes-that-BESPEAK-a-reality.  The fact that the set is, in reality, a null set does not change the fact that a PLURAL VERB IS REQUIRED HERE, MR COLE!!

    Posted by liz on 2005 12 25 at 06:53 PM • permalink

  11. When I was four years old, I knew there was a Santa Claus, because I wanted to believe.

    It turned out to be “one of those hoaxes that bespeaks a reality”.

    Posted by rinardman on 2005 12 25 at 06:54 PM • permalink

  12. Bespoke? Hah! Cole gets his reality off the rack at Walmart.

    Posted by Pixy Misa on 2005 12 25 at 07:49 PM • permalink

  13. #10 Liz, are you sure he wasn’t bespoking? He is, after all, a professor who can do know wrong.

    Posted by Mike H. on 2005 12 25 at 07:50 PM • permalink

  14. Au contraire, Cole is absolutely right: this is a hoax that definitely “bespeaks a reality” - the reality being that Cole and his fellow leftoids are f***ing idiots.

    Posted by Urbs in Horto on 2005 12 25 at 08:34 PM • permalink

  15. I figured this out while reading a old Superman comic book.  Obviously these people are living in Bizzaro Earth and due to some sort of time-space continuim, they keep popping up on our Earth.  Just think of the hassles that our Juan Cole must be going under, stuck in bizzaro Juan Cole’s earth.  Of course, he’s probably dead by now.  At some point the bizzaro Cole must notice that he isnt living in a facist dictatorship.  After all, just looking around he should be able to see NO ONE has one of those Evil Spock Beards.  Always a tip off.

    Posted by jeff mccabe on 2005 12 25 at 10:08 PM • permalink

  16. Sorry, almost no one.  Remember when Gore was running around with the beard?  Not so funny now is it?

    Posted by jeff mccabe on 2005 12 25 at 10:10 PM • permalink

  17. There is a difference between the WMD issue and the Red Book story.

    WMD’s in Iraq was no lie. Everybody believed it including just about every intelligence agency on the planet. Turns out Saddam probably was playing some kind of double or triple bluff that only a mind like his could conjure up. Besides who doubts that left to himself he would soon have his old toys back. Especially with what we now know about the sanctions.

    On the other hand the red book story was a lie. As transparent and implausible as it was malicious. And look how many people fell over themselves to believe it and spread it. Facts and truth do not matter to these people. Theirs is a fantasy romantic world full of white knights, wicked witches and dragons. That’s why so many of them spend their lives in universities. To go outside and face reality would involve having to grow up.

    Posted by geoff on 2005 12 25 at 10:30 PM • permalink

  18. So, I see that Cole is an oppressor of history at the University of Michigan. Not a historian that values facts very highly, I’m afraid. He states in his little burst of indignation that the Bush administration, with the unwarranted surveillance (btw, he points out that “unwarranted ” is not a pun - har, har, good one Perfessor), has reached new heights of criminality. Evidence, please? Is it because Bush is doing pretty much the same thing as Clinton with respect to NSA eavesdropping? Is it then guilt by association, or what, exactly? Cole also claims that some people of his acquaintance have been questioned for importing Arabic books. What kind of books, Juanito? Agroeconomics textbooks, or Jihad for Dummies? And questioned by whom? Sounds like the Unreality-based Community to me.

    Posted by paco on 2005 12 25 at 10:53 PM • permalink

  19. I should also add that Cole is routinely bitch-slapped by people with real expertise in Middle Eastern history, like Bernard Lewis and Daniel Pipes. On top of that, he looks like Heinrich Himmler during the latter’s chicken-farming days. Mr. Cole need no longer detain us.

    Posted by paco on 2005 12 25 at 11:07 PM • permalink

  20. Reminds me of the double-talk over Moore’s F 9/11.  Moore was not trying to factual or balanced , he was a ‘myth-maker’.  It is only one’s opponents that are held to the highest standards of truth.

    Posted by Inurbanus on 2005 12 25 at 11:15 PM • permalink

  21. Juan R. I. Cole is author of the weblog Informed Comment, which covers the U.S.-led occupation of Iraq and other developments in the Middle East. He is a Professor of Modern Middle East and South Asian History in the History Department at the University of Michigan.

    Professor Cole obtained his B.A. in History and Literature of Religions at Northwestern University (1975), his M.A. in Arabic Studies/History at American University in Cairo (1978), and his Ph.D. in Islamic Studies at University of California Los Angeles (1984). He was the recipient of Fulbright-Hays fellowships to India (1982) and Egypt (1985-1986). Since 1999 he has been the editor of The International Journal of Middle East Studies, and has served in professional offices for the Middle East Studies Association and the American Institute of Iranian Studies.

    The Bespoken One

    Handsome son of a bitch, ain’t he? Awwww hell, now this asshole made me swear on Christmas. That pisses me off. Shit!

    Sure hope NSA has tagged his phone and his phone calls, cause for all intents and purposes, this ugly bastard, is an Islamist.

    Posted by El Cid on 2005 12 25 at 11:29 PM • permalink

  22. Sometimes the low-caliber commentary of these people (Ivins, Kingston, Dowd, Rich, Krugman) makes me wonder why we pay any attention to them at all?

    Oh yeah ... because the world’s biggest print publications sponsor them, and not any of a thousand more intelligent writers who don’t happen to also be leftists.

    Dumb question.

    Posted by Rittenhouse on 2005 12 25 at 11:37 PM • permalink

  23. I wonder how many Nigerian mail scams this turkey has fallen for??
    They seem to be as “factually reality based” as his paranoid mind can handle.
    Any chance of a once a day black hellicopter flyby by one of our resident evil neo con cabal members? Should be enough to make his head pop.

    Posted by thefrollickingmole on 2005 12 25 at 11:50 PM • permalink

  24. #10 Liz,
    Considering Cole’s paranoia, I think it should be bespooked.

    Posted by Michael Lonie on 2005 12 26 at 12:02 AM • permalink

  25. Heres another lovely “reality based” bit of reporting from kindymedia. Nothing ani semetic here, nup not at all.
    A lefty peace and love site which is more or as racist (as long as its JOOOS) as any nazi site.

    http://www.sydney.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=63013&group=webcast

    Posted by thefrollickingmole on 2005 12 26 at 12:03 AM • permalink

  26. I’d just like to echo Geoff’s (#17) remarks.

    Before the second war on Iraq, everyone believed that Saddam had in his possession considerable stores of WMD material. It was an entirely bipartisan issue. Democrats, Republicans, hell even the UN (and more importantly, UN inspectors including - but not limited to - renown child appreciator, Scott Ritter).

    Everyone agreed that Saddam possessed them, and that something had to be done about it. The road diverged only at what that something would consist of.

    Leftists believed that the previous 12 years of completely fruitless UN resolutions and condemnations were doing a bang up job. Conservatives wanted regime change.

    In the case of this red book nonsense, as was the case of the CNN Bush memo and the plastic turkey, the left rushes to unconditionally accept and act upon a story that is initially sketchy and unverified, then totally debunked. Even after the story is debunked, a significant portion wheel out the “fake but true” nonsense.

    The same cannot be said of Iraq and WMD. The intelligence agencies of the west - including those of France and Germany - had concluded based on the best available information that Saddam possessed significant stores of WMD, and was engaged in an ongoing program to develop nuclear weapons. It was their advice that Bush acted upon.

    For the leftist journalists, failure to act upon a fake turkey story deprives their drooling readership of yet another opportunity to laugh at Chimpy MacHallibush’s innate stupidity. That’s the extent of the consequences they face.

    For the President of the United States, failure to act upon WMD information provided to him by the intelligence agencies of the western nations and the UN weapon’s inspectors, could result in a million Americans dying. Some from the blast wave, some from the fireball and a hell of a lot more from fallout.

    Posted by Mike Jericho on 2005 12 26 at 12:09 AM • permalink

  27. I thought this guy’s name rang a bell. Unfortunately I’m not good at linking but go to The Buggy Professor site.[www.thebuggyprofessor.org]

    This is Prof Michael Gordon of UC Santa Barbara and living breathing proof that not all Political Science/Middle East Studies academics are bad or mad. First read what he has to say about himself.  Then read what he has to say about Prof Cole in his first and third instalments of his article on Pape’s book published earlier this year.

    Juan Cole - a leading apologist for Islamist extremism and even terrorism

    On Jihad as a religion-sanctioned use of violence and war against infidels ... glossed over and sugarcoated by the pc-infested apologists in the Middle East Studies Association in this country, one of whose heads bragged after 9/11 that he was glad none of the members had remotely predicted such a terrorist attack from fundamentalist Muslims, and the current head (Juan Cole) who has tried to carry out a personal but secret campaighn to smear the major Middle East scholar who has uncovered the towering defects of their work on Islamist movements and the pc-pieties that underlie their apologia ... see two recent and important book-length studies [ here and here ]. Regarding Juan Cole’s efforts to smear Martin Kramer, a scholar whose work in knowledge and insight towers above Cole’s feeble excuse-making pc-pieties, click on [Kramer site] and read Cole’s exposed character-assassination memo to his fellow pc-acolytes and Kramer’s astonished, detailed replies.

    I’m glad I’m not a US taxpayer and thereby helping to pay for Cole and his ugly gang. Mind you knowing I’m helping to pay for the Australian versions poisoning kids’ minds is nauseating.

    Posted by geoff on 2005 12 26 at 01:05 AM • permalink

  28. #17

    Don’t mistake me, I fully believe that the information Bush (and most of the western world) had was truely believed by him. I also do not think the information was really false in that I think Hussein had the weapons and managed to get them out of the country or hide them.

    Oh and neat having a post directly mentioned.

    Posted by chrisbg99 on 2005 12 26 at 02:18 AM • permalink

  29. I have encountered some lefty blogs that are being quite adult about the hoax, though—so there is hope for some of ‘em.

    Posted by The Sanity Inspector on 2005 12 26 at 02:25 AM • permalink

  30. If things were really as totalitarian and Cole and his ilk like to think, they would all be in jail or dead.

    Or, as Lileks once said of another set of leftists who imagined themselves to be in the lead role of The Omega Man; If America were as bad as they say, they’d be bones in a Virginia forest by now.

    Posted by The Sanity Inspector on 2005 12 26 at 02:27 AM • permalink

  31. #17, geoff: Turns out Saddam probably was playing some kind of double or triple bluff that only a mind like his could conjure up.

    No, it’s not so hard to understand, really.  All abhorrent aspects of the man aside, he is no dummy—he ruled a country as he saw fit, and he made only one mistake.

    His seemingly ridiculous statements to the effect that, “I don’t have any WMD, and if you attack me, I’ll use them”, were calculated to do two things:

    A) Cause the UN to fawn all over him (this part was not so tough)
    B) Cause other states in the region, (including but not limited to Iran), to fear him.

    Saddam feared Iran more than he feared the US.  He didn’t think the US would actually ever do anything, at least he didn’t believe that until it was far too late.  And you should know the test questions on that attitude by now.

    Consider that, and everything fits.

    Posted by zeppenwolf on 2005 12 26 at 03:57 AM • permalink

  32. Unfortunately, when all is said and done and we win this, people like Professor Wank Hole will simply move on to the next anti-American cause-de-jour.

    Posted by murph on 2005 12 26 at 06:01 AM • permalink

  33. A Dutch businessman has been found guilty of war crimes and sentenced to 15 years in prison for helping Saddam Hussein to acquire the chemical weapons he used to kill thousands of Kurdish civilians in the Iran-Iraq war.

    The Australian

    Given WMDs were a figment of GWB’s and Tony Blair’s imaginations there must be a terrible miscarriage of justice here. The Dutch court must be under the control of Karl Rove. Why no indignation from the “Bush Lied” mob?

    Posted by walterplinge on 2005 12 26 at 06:33 AM • permalink

  34. walterplinge—Ya gotta understand. WMD’s are not a war crime once you use them all up.

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 12 26 at 09:54 AM • permalink

  35. Jeff: No, no. In the Evil Spock Universe, only people without beards in ours have beards. Anyone with a beard in our universe is, of course, cleanshaven in the ESU.

    Don Johnson doesn’t change, though.

    Posted by Sigivald on 2005 12 26 at 04:20 PM • permalink

  36. This just in!

    Frontpage magazine has an article on Jon.

    NB: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=20636

    Posted by Go Canucks on 2005 12 27 at 03:46 AM • permalink

  37. This reminds me of a conversation I had with a leftwing cousin (he and his mom are into this really strange combination of Catholicism and conspiracy theories).  He gave the usual “America is now a police state” and ” Ashcroft is thrwoing all dissenters in jail” yadda yadda etc. 

    After pointing out the great civil liberties that were curtailed in the CIvil War, WWI, and WWII, and noting that NOTHING remotely similar has occured today, I then said “If America is a police state, why is Michael Moore a millionaire?”

    To which he replied “Well, Bush and Ashcroft WANT to send Moore to jail.”
    And somehow that was supposed to explain everything.

    Posted by Room 237 on 2005 12 28 at 04:01 PM • permalink

  38. Ah, so Bush is a powerless totalitarian. Yep, that makes sense.

    Posted by Dave S. on 2005 12 29 at 01:13 AM • permalink

  39. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.