<< REPORTER SCHOOLED ~ MAIN ~ AUSTRALIA FRIGHTENS MODO >>

SASS QUASHED

Dilpazier Aslam, the sassy junior Guardianista exposed by Scott Burgess, has been fired:

On Monday July 18 Aslam was advised that the Guardian considered that Hizb ut-Tahrir had promoted violence and anti-semitic material on its website and that membership of the organisation was not compatible with being a Guardian trainee.

The following day Aslam told the editor, Alan Rusbridger, that he was not willing to leave Hizb ut-Tahrir and that, while he personally repudiated anti-semitism, he did not consider the website material to be promoting violence or to be anti-semitic.

The matter was subsequently treated under the paper’s grievance and disciplinary procedure. Aslam was invited to a meeting with GNL’s chief executive, Carolyn McCall, at which he repeated his refusal to leave the organisation or repudiate its material.

Having considered all the circumstances Ms McCall took the view that Aslam could not remain a member of the Guardian’s trainee scheme.

The paper will carry a clarification making it clear that Aslam’s membership of Hizb ut-Tahrir should have been mentioned in the context of his July 13 article.

So he wasn’t promoted after all. We await a similar clarification on Aslam’s Hizb ut-Tahrir membership from The Age.

UPDATE. The Guardian is now so fearful of blogger reprisals that it’s omitted a byline from this bitchy anti-blogger piece

(Via LGF)

Posted by Tim B. on 07/23/2005 at 12:55 AM
  1. it will be most interesting to see whether the Glesga Goblin at Grauniad Sur Yarra cares to acknowledge this

    Posted by KK on 2005 07 23 at 02:25 AM • permalink

  2. We await a similar clarification on Aslam’s Hizb ut-Tahrir membership from The Age.

    Hope you’re not holding your breath.  Breathe, Tim, breathe.

    Posted by Achillea on 2005 07 23 at 02:26 AM • permalink

  3. Someone has to fisk the article in the Guardian media section Aslam targeted by bloggers

    The bitterness makes for a fun read.

    Posted by Ripclawe on 2005 07 23 at 02:46 AM • permalink

  4. as well as raise legitimate concerns about journalism and transparency

    Amazing how you have to get, literally, all the way to the end of the article to find this admission.  And the fact that it’s bylined only ‘A staff reporter’ makes the irony all the sharper.

    Posted by Achillea on 2005 07 23 at 02:52 AM • permalink

  5. Just in: Sassy terrorist attacks in Egypt

    Posted by Quentin George on 2005 07 23 at 03:07 AM • permalink

  6. And of course it is a fatwah from Scott who was turned down for a job at the Guardian?
    Why the hell would Scott apply for employment at the Guardanista?

    Posted by davo on 2005 07 23 at 03:28 AM • permalink

  7. He could have a full time job guarding the Guardian - against itself!

    Posted by blogstrop on 2005 07 23 at 04:11 AM • permalink

  8. It’s okay.  Aslam is a natural fit at this magazine.

    Posted by Sean M on 2005 07 23 at 04:22 AM • permalink

  9. Is Tim’s title alluding to the Guardian having a bigfoot in its mouth?

    Posted by blogstrop on 2005 07 23 at 04:55 AM • permalink

  10. Goooooolly. Retrospective shame.

    Posted by crash on 2005 07 23 at 05:36 AM • permalink

  11. And in the tabloid Sun, their attack-dog columnist, Richard Littlejohn, took the opportunity to claim: “A Guardian journalist has been unmasked as an Islamist extremist”.

    Err, well.. yes, he is an Islamist extremist, is he not?

    Apparantly its poor form to print certain facts. These crazy Brits!

    O/T McGrath once again batting magnificently at Lords, helped by Simon Katich.

    Posted by Scott W on 2005 07 23 at 07:34 AM • permalink

  12. davo “Why the hell would Scott apply for employment at the Guardanista?”

    It was a spoof application. He knew they would never employ someone with his views. The (lack of) progress with his application was covered in his blog a year or so ago.

    Posted by shaygoss on 2005 07 23 at 08:37 AM • permalink

  13. I wonder if the anonymous “staff reporter” who wrote that piece wasn’t Aslam himself?  A parting gift from the Guardian?

    Posted by jic on 2005 07 23 at 09:14 AM • permalink

  14. Guardian Mailing List

    Play nice, kiddies…

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 07 23 at 10:53 AM • permalink

  15. Emphasis mine:

    “Scott Burgess, a blogger from New Orleans who recently moved to London, spends his time indoors posting repeated attacks on the Guardian for its stance on the environment, its columnists such as Polly Toynbee, and its recent intervention in the US presidential election campaign.”

    The Guardian publishes from a circus tent, then? Or do they sit under a big tree with their laptops?

    And why are they posting an editorial defending Aslam, and themselves for hiring him, after they’ve just given him the boot? If Burgess and the rest were wrong, why is this guy looking for another job? (Preferrably not one that involves a bulky jacket with wires trailing from it.)

    Posted by Jim Treacher on 2005 07 23 at 12:59 PM • permalink

  16. He should have been given the KRATOS treatment.

    Posted by Arty on 2005 07 23 at 01:21 PM • permalink

  17. Poor Guardian — So when the bomb goes off at the Guardian, will THAT be an act of terrorism?

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 07 23 at 01:44 PM • permalink

  18. When the Guardianistas read that, it will become ‘right-wing bloggers call for bombing of Guardian offices’.

    Posted by jic on 2005 07 23 at 04:28 PM • permalink

  19. No, that’s not true.  It will be ‘far-right bloggers…’

    Posted by jic on 2005 07 23 at 04:29 PM • permalink

  20. http://smh.com.au/news/national/revealed-radical-islamic-push-in-sydney/2005/07/23/1121539189989.html

    Fairfax left hand not realising what the other left hand is doing.

    Posted by captain on 2005 07 23 at 05:42 PM • permalink

  21. So… the Guardian is afraid of bloggers?

    Awwwriiiight!

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2005 07 23 at 08:47 PM • permalink

  22. the Guardian considered that Hizb ut-Tahrir had promoted violence and anti-semitic material on its website and that membership of the organisation was not compatible with being a Guardian trainee.

    Since when?

    Posted by Jim Geones on 2005 07 25 at 04:50 AM • permalink

  23. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.