<< POLITICIAN AMIDST CAR SALESMEN ~ MAIN ~ SOUL LIFTED HEAVENWARD >>

SOCCER CAUSES DRUG ADDICTION AND JEWISHNESS

Saudi cleric Nasser bin Sliman Al-Omar explains:

You know how our sons used to admire one of the great players. You know how our sons used to admire him. He came as a guest to a certain Saudi city. He was hosted by one of the soccer clubs. They imitated him in everything, including his earring. Someone asked a young man: “Why are you wearing an earring?” He answered: “Because that player wears one.” He said to him: “But he wears it on his left ear,” so the young man moved it to his left ear. Do you know what became of this player? He became a drug addict, despite being an international player, and he began to visit the so-called Wailing Wall in Israel. This is the man admired by our sons, I’m sad to say.

The vagueness of these fables—a certain Saudi city, one of the soccer clubs, and so on—is a charming feature, don’t you think? Speaking of fables, the Sydney Morning Herald’s Paul McGeough isn’t convinced that Zarqawi is dead, although he was certain that Iyad Allawi shot six suspected insurgents at a Baghdad police station. All depends on the quality of his sources, I guess. Former SMH cadet Antony Loewenstein ponders recent developments:

An occupied people have the legitimate and legal right to resist occupation.

He’s right, of course. And Iraqis are delighted to have rid themselves of an occupying Jordanian.

Posted by Tim B. on 06/09/2006 at 01:54 AM
  1. An occupied people have the legitimate and legal right to resist occupation

    Oh no, the Iraqis are brown and so is Zarqawi…so he has a right to be there…as opposed to gweilos…

    Posted by murph on 2006 06 09 at 02:04 AM • permalink

  2. Paul McGeough should stop reporting from the Middle East. He is doing more harm than good, although it is questionable whether he is doing any good at all.

    I don’t think he does.

    Posted by The Best Infidel on 2006 06 09 at 02:24 AM • permalink

  3. If you wear an earing on your left ear you will be killed, according to the Koran.

    Posted by Howzat on 2006 06 09 at 02:27 AM • permalink

  4. Loewenstein also says: “The death of al-Zarqawi will be as effective in killing off the insurgency as the capture of Saddam Hussein.”

    Perhaps this remark of Loewenstein’s is closer to the mark than those made by Mark Steyn in December 2003: “The sight of Saddam looking like a department-store Santa who has been sleeping off a bender in a sewer for a week will deal a fatal blow to the Ba’athist thugs’ ability to intimidate local populations. The insurgency will continue for a few weeks yet, but it will peter out, like the dictator, not with a bang but a whimper.”

    Posted by gson on 2006 06 09 at 02:45 AM • permalink

  5. #4 gson, yeah, but ya gotta start somewhere….

    one by one is better than none…

    Posted by closeapproximation on 2006 06 09 at 02:49 AM • permalink

  6. I got as far as “US backed Shiite death squads…”. Did anyone manage to read more?, I was starting to retch.

    Posted by Daniel San on 2006 06 09 at 03:09 AM • permalink

  7. gson - do we know that the insurgency is still significantly Ba’athist? Zarqawi was A-Q.

    Tend to agree with Lowey on this (gack!) - it’s a ideology we’re fighting, not a man. Gotta keep chippin’ away.

    Posted by Dave S. on 2006 06 09 at 03:09 AM • permalink

  8. If Loewenstein is referring to the joint US-Iraqi-<insert the other 35 countries here> coalition when he says “occupiers”, then I say the occupiers have a legitimate and legal right to return fire.

    Posted by Matthew Lawrence on 2006 06 09 at 03:53 AM • permalink

  9. Does anyone have the 10-digit grid coordinate to Paul McGeough’s house?  I have some Air Force buddies who might be willing to setup a little demonstration for Paul to display the technique they used on Zarqawi. This might better assist him in comprehending the certainty of Zarqawi’s demise.

    Posted by Texas Bob on 2006 06 09 at 03:58 AM • permalink

  10. Just to clarify my #7 - I’m referring to the Lowey quote in #4. The quote in the post is loathsome even by Ant standards.

    Posted by Dave S. on 2006 06 09 at 04:16 AM • permalink

  11. I think I’ve just found a valid reason to follow Soccer, sorry, Football.

    Posted by Razor on 2006 06 09 at 04:28 AM • permalink

  12. Antony Loewenstein is the Barbara Cartland of political commentary.

    Posted by Hanyu on 2006 06 09 at 04:31 AM • permalink

  13. Moral indignation from the perpetually stupid. As meaningless as the snippets of radio stations as you blithely tune past them.

    Just tune them out. It seems to be working for them(Ant et al)

    Posted by CB on 2006 06 09 at 05:44 AM • permalink

  14. Paul McGeough: “His demise in the fraught context of today’s Iraq would be a phenomenal development for Washington and the struggling Government of the Prime Minister, Nouri al-Maliki.”

    Yeah, but he’s also said that he will be immediately replaced and we mustn’t exult, etc.
    McGeough is either into self-parody or taking lessons from Robert Fisk.

    Posted by Barrie on 2006 06 09 at 05:50 AM • permalink

  15. “Someone asked a young man: “Why are you wearing an earring?” He answered: “Because that player wears one.” He said to him: “But he wears it on his left ear,” so the young man moved it to his left ear. Do you know what became of this player? He became a drug addict, despite being an international player, and he began to visit the so-called Wailing Wall in Israel.”

    So THESE are the guys who make up urban legends!

    Posted by ushie on 2006 06 09 at 06:33 AM • permalink

  16. The vagueness of these fables—a certain Saudi city, one of the soccer clubs, and so on—is a charming feature, don’t you think?

    And it probably happened in 1364 or so. The Muslims did invent football, right?

    Posted by PW on 2006 06 09 at 08:47 AM • permalink

  17. Well, even a stopped clock is right twice a day. Soccer does cause all sorts of deviant behavior, although Jewishness is not deviant. Stick to real sports like baseball.

    Posted by SoberHT on 2006 06 09 at 08:53 AM • permalink

  18. Oy vey! And I thought it was discovering kosher pastry that led to this talith around my shoulders. Now I know it was all because of this round-ball nonsense. No wonder Mama was always kvetching about it.

    Posted by Wolfbane on 2006 06 09 at 08:57 AM • permalink

  19. Texas Bob — No, it’s time we took a stand for traditional American values.  Can’t your buddies whip up an Arc Light?  Ain’t seen one of those in years…

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2006 06 09 at 09:41 AM • permalink

  20. So if my granddaughter plays soccer, she’s going to grow up to… let me get this straight… wear earrings?

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2006 06 09 at 10:21 AM • permalink

  21. The vagueness of these fables—a certain Saudi city, one of the soccer clubs, and so on—is a charming feature, don’t you think?

    He’s talking about Diego Maradona. (Photo) I’m linking to the whole page, not the picture of Maradona, because the one of the Dalai Lama wearing a kippah serugah is too good to miss. As is the one of Yoko Ono looking around to make sure attention is being paid to her.

    Posted by Otter on 2006 06 09 at 10:32 AM • permalink

  22. On a less somber note.

    That World Cup thing starts in less than an hour.

    Hmm Costa Rica versus Germany.
    Costa Rica is really busy today because they are doing something with a “Alemania”.  Hope they can keep up.  That’s in something called Premeria Ronda?  They say it’s “En Vivo”.  Hope that’s not like letterbox or something.  I hate leterbox.  I’ll look in on that and get back here real soon.  I know that many of you rely on me to keep abreast of all these shifting cultural paradigms.

    Addendum follows.  I’ll try to find out why Germany gets to start this Cup thing off.  I thought they were better with beer.  Oh well.

    Posted by yojimbo on 2006 06 09 at 11:36 AM • permalink

  23. I’m hoping the Saudi miscreant could be Saeed al-Owairan, whose Maradona-like slalom through the Belgian team unfolded in front of my eyes at RFK Stadium, Washington.

    This will be the first World Cup I will avoid in 36 years. Cold turkey for four weeks. Hope everyone gets home safe.

    Posted by chinesearithmetic on 2006 06 09 at 11:43 AM • permalink

  24. Four weeks!!!

    Is this some sort of “test”

    This is June and not November(re)!

    Heh!

    Posted by yojimbo on 2006 06 09 at 12:01 PM • permalink

  25. RebeccaH, it is haram for your granddaughter to be playing soccer in the first place. But that’s ok, as it is nearly impossible to kick a ball in a burqa anyway.

    Posted by trexkilla on 2006 06 09 at 12:04 PM • permalink

  26. Three scores-goals-gols in 17 minutes!

    And some of you out there thought that NFL Europe would have no impact.

    Let that be a lesson to you.

    Posted by yojimbo on 2006 06 09 at 12:29 PM • permalink

  27. #19 richard, about this Arc Light idea… If you’re talking B-52 combat history, I’m not sure it would be quite the same…

    I mean, fashion alert! Plain freefall iron bombs are so last century :)

    Most likely the ol’ Buffs would be loaded about ten deep and a dozen high with JDAM inertia/satellite guided bombs. Given the rules of engagement, of course, the whole caboodle would rain straight down the chimney pot of one bloody house.

    The neighbours might notice that sort of thing and it’d dint the campaign budget a bit.

    But, ya know… for folks like Zark you really can’t do enough, and hey, what a spectacle!

    Posted by splice on 2006 06 09 at 01:55 PM • permalink

  28. “A Saudi city” is vague. “A certain Saudi city” is downright coy.

    Posted by ForNow on 2006 06 09 at 04:27 PM • permalink

  29. #28 I’ll see your JDAM and raise you one MOAB http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/03/11/sprj.irq.moab/

    Posted by lmassie on 2006 06 09 at 05:38 PM • permalink

  30. #16. Yup. And they ruled inancient England.

    Posted by Nilknarf Arbed on 2006 06 09 at 05:59 PM • permalink

  31. #26 yojimbo: Three scores-goals-gols in 17 minutes!
    And some of you out there thought that NFL Europe would have no impact.

    Try Australian Rules, yojimbo.  Not quite the frenetic scoring of NBL [like watching tennis], but on a ground 180 yards long by 140 wide you get a score every 2-3 minutes -50 plus per game.

    If only soccer’s rules had changed to give the modern skills and effort - and the crowds - the reward they deserve. 
    Six goals in 90 minutes is still only one in 15, and is highly unusual..

    Prepare to be bored on a world scale. 
    I predict 60 games over some 100 hours of play will produce a goal only every 30 minutes. 

    Aussie Rules has 10x the entertainment even when scoring is slow..

    Posted by Barrie on 2006 06 09 at 07:47 PM • permalink

  32. Oh, and I forgot.  I hope the referee doesn’t decide the World Cup with a single mistake. 
    What other sport forces one side to play with a player [or two] missing for maybe 70-80 minutes??
    Crazy rule..

    Posted by Barrie on 2006 06 09 at 07:59 PM • permalink

  33. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.