<< MAN OF PRINCIPLE ~ MAIN ~ GET ME TO SCHOOL ON TIME >>

SONGWRITERS, COMBINED AGE 1498 YEARS, DISAGREE

Keith Richards, who in 2003 urged “Osama and the boys” to “bring it on”, is distancing himself from a new Rolling Stones tune that attacks neo-cons:

Guitarist Keith Richards disclaims responsibility for the song, written by singer Mick Jagger: “If I’m going to write a song, politicians are the last subject I think of,” he tells USA Today. ” ‘Neo-Con’ is like an old headline. Nobody will know what it means in 10 years.” Sort of like “Center 42.”

But Jagger says: “I have my opinions, which I’ve stated in the tune. Maureen Dowd is no more qualified to have opinions than I am.” No one can possibly disagree with that.

Not at all, Mr Taranto. Of Jagger’s song, we may now consign it to the pit already filled to overflowing with other Jagger solo projects.

Posted by Tim B. on 08/22/2005 at 08:41 AM
  1. Jagger won’t get no satisfaction.

    —Nora

    Posted by The Thin Man Returns on 2005 08 22 at 09:49 AM • permalink

  2. Jagger you are a joke,a pitiful hypocritical hedonistic ho.You are a leech.Reality is so far away from you and your ilk, it’s breathtaking.Daddy will keep the pigs away;slag him off behind his back,take his allowance,shun his creed.
    Under my thumb indeed.twit.

    Posted by bleary on 2005 08 22 at 10:05 AM • permalink

  3. o/t Andrew denton interviews a muslim couple-he a company director, her an academic? gushes all over them and they in turn talk of prejudice they have experienced.
    She says George Bush is frustrating and dumb.Audience,the converted,titter along with denton.
    Meanwhile on 7.30,red kerry showcased several muslims who complained they “needed” to be represented at government conference on terrorism.

    Posted by crash on 2005 08 22 at 10:21 AM • permalink

  4. Didn’t these guys write ‘c**k sucker blues’?  Maybe they should take a leaf out of ACDC’s book: ‘One of these days I’m gonna change my evil ways and Ride On….Ride on’  or perhaps they should ‘ride out on the sunset on your colour tv screen…out to get what I can get, if you know what I mean’...Or maybe they should go down to park and get some neo con girls who are jus dyiiiine to meetch you.  Doooh dooo dooo do doo do do dooo do Miss You’. Not.  Why don’t any of these guys go to Woomera and sew their lips up, I men seriously for the good of humanity we would appreciate that kind of practical demonstration!

    Posted by platey mates on 2005 08 22 at 10:26 AM • permalink

  5. Congratulations to Keith Richard for refusing to be spooked by the threat of terrorism. Can’t work out the angle that Mick is taking on neo-cons. Can’t work out his reference to Maureen Dowd either but a quick google reveals that she is about on a level with our Margo.

    Posted by Rafe on 2005 08 22 at 10:33 AM • permalink

  6. #3 I think we need to be represented at the Govt conference on terrorism.  After all they are killing us,last time I checked we weren’t indiscriminately killing Muslims because they weren’t Christians.  The ABC and SBS have descended into farce.

    Posted by platey mates on 2005 08 22 at 10:38 AM • permalink

  7. I mean I like early Stones as much as anyone,but I also like watching Kelly Slater surf.
    He has tried the same trick,prompted by journosluts,it’s worse than an honest opinion because it is so conditional on environment.
    Should/could /would,do what I say cos I have been told my opinion is valuable to our youth.
    Just don’t know what I am on about.

    Posted by bleary on 2005 08 22 at 10:40 AM • permalink

  8. Rafe, our Maureen is much less amusing than your Margo. Margo is full-on demented, while Dowd, after the initial shock of her scare-the-horses shrillness, is predictable and boring.

    Posted by ak on 2005 08 22 at 10:45 AM • permalink

  9. Why does every other artist think they have something sooooo incredibly important to say?  I mean really!

    Posted by platey mates on 2005 08 22 at 10:46 AM • permalink

  10. Clearly we need the right kind of guidance,the type of guidance that will be ushered in by our enlightened betters.
    I mean really who better to tell us what to think?
    It is for your own good,submit.

    Posted by bleary on 2005 08 22 at 10:54 AM • permalink

  11. Yes, but ofcourse your right.  What would I know, with only two post graduate degrees.  Bottom line is I ain’t got a knighthood and I don’t got no multi million dollars.  Therefore Mick IS smarter than me and SHOULD be telling me what to think.  I humbly submit myslef at your service Sir Mick!

    Posted by platey mates on 2005 08 22 at 11:06 AM • permalink

  12. Not at all, Mr Taranto.

    I don’t get it—what’s this reference to?

    James?  What’s he doing in here?

    Posted by zeppenwolf on 2005 08 22 at 11:10 AM • permalink

  13. So what is “Center 42,” anyway?

    Posted by jgm on 2005 08 22 at 11:26 AM • permalink

  14. jgm, you are soooo uncool not knowing what centre 42 is. Really!

    Posted by platey mates on 2005 08 22 at 11:35 AM • permalink

  15. Jagger probably wrote the lyrics after consulting with his marketing people; the ageing-hippie after-market demand for lefty tunes is still strong. Jagger really shouldn’t be let out on his on when it comes to performing or writing. I always felt that his ballad, “Angie”, was exhibit A for the existence of payola in the music business; it’s one of the worst excuses for a song ever recorded, and just hearing a couple of bars of the thing makes me want to take an ice-pick to my ear drums (or to Jagger’s larynx).

    Posted by paco on 2005 08 22 at 11:56 AM • permalink

  16. Now I have that whiney crap revolving on the inside paco,thanks for that.

    Posted by bleary on 2005 08 22 at 12:05 PM • permalink

  17. Can’t work out the angle that Mick is taking on neo-cons.

    For the same reason that Joan Baez is at Camp Cindy, Sean Penn sucked up to Hussein, Martin Sheen sings praises of Castro, Linda Ronstadt went moonbat on a Las Vegas stage, etc., etc., ad nausem......

    They are all ancient entertainers, hoping to rekindle the flame of passion in the public, and once again be in the limelight, and bask in their refurbished glory, thereby increasing ticket and CD sales enormously.

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2005 08 22 at 12:12 PM • permalink

  18. Huh? What’s a “Jagger”?

    These “Rolling Stones” sure make me feel young and cool (something I rarely feel these days).

    Posted by Drunk Fade on 2005 08 22 at 12:21 PM • permalink

  19. Sorry about that, Bleary; I hadn’t considered the destructive power of simply mentioning the tune. Here’s what you do: get a tape or CD of Count Basie’s 1947 recording of Seventh Avenue Express and turn it up loud. The trumpet solo will knock any residual Jagger whining right out of your head.

    Posted by paco on 2005 08 22 at 12:38 PM • permalink

  20. No Basie here sadly,have gone off on a tangent and oddly transfixed by ‘the girl with faraway eyes’....think thats the title.
    definately serious whining,tho with some self deprecation now sadly absent.

    Posted by bleary on 2005 08 22 at 01:05 PM • permalink

  21. Pathetic. Blew their one chance at life on “the rock & roll lifestyle”. They’re gonna die alone, in a rented room, face down in their own vomit.

    Posted by nofixedabode on 2005 08 22 at 02:39 PM • permalink

  22. #12

    I don’t get it—what’s this reference to?

    James?  What’s he doing in here?

    The block quote is from Friday’s Best of the Web.

    Posted by nofixedabode on 2005 08 22 at 02:46 PM • permalink

  23. #14 platey mates,

    Hah! Now can I hang out with you guys? Please please pleeeeease?

    Rats.

    Posted by jgm on 2005 08 22 at 04:14 PM • permalink

  24. Well, Jagger IS in an excellent position to comment on Neo-Cons. 

    As an extremely wealthy business tycoon with a knighthood he’s a rock-solid member of the Establishment.

    Or as his adoring fans might say, “the system, man.”

    Isn’t that the same capitalist “system” those dastardly “neo-cons” supposedly control?

    Mick, what can it all mean?

    Oh, but of course he can’t see me or hear me. 

    Once they roll up the blacked-out windows of those limos, they’re securely sealed off from the riff-raff.

    Posted by JJM Ballantyne on 2005 08 22 at 05:06 PM • permalink

  25. I’m no fan of rock and roll, so I can’t comment on the music, but in the pictures I’ve seen online, Jagger looks cadaverous and unwell.

    I wonder if he’s suffering from some disease that has eaten away at his body.  Do fans approve of this new look?

    Posted by blerp on 2005 08 22 at 05:29 PM • permalink

  26. OT:

    Hey, Zeppenwolf:

    I’m getting bounced mails from you (from the comment message notification) because apparently “zeppenwolf@lafn.org” is either not a valid email or it’s having a problem. Please go into your profile on Timblair.net, go to your email preferences, and uncheck the box next to “Enable email notifications by default when you post messages.” And if you are using a fake email please replace it with a real one. Thank you.

    (Note: I also sent this to your Hotmail email address on your website, or what I hope is your website.)

    Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2005 08 22 at 05:34 PM • permalink

  27. Jagger looked unwell thirty years ago, he must have the constitution of an ox.

    For trivia buffs, he is one of (at least) two distinguished dropouts from the London School of Economics. The other that I have in mind is the novelist Naipaul, but that could be wrong.

    Posted by Rafe on 2005 08 22 at 05:40 PM • permalink

  28. “o/t Andrew denton interviews a muslim couple-he a company director, her an academic? gushes all over them and they in turn talk of prejudice they have experienced.
    She says George Bush is frustrating and dumb.Audience,the converted,titter along with denton.”

    crash, what were you doing watching denton at 9.30pm??......if you watched 24 you could see jack bauer giving it to arab terrorists and saving the free world…..wooohooo.

    you would enjoy this more than the abc.

    Posted by vinny on 2005 08 22 at 06:20 PM • permalink

  29. #7 - bleary:

    I didn’t realize that Slater was such a chomsky-tainted moonbat.

    That sucks!

    Apparently his talent for connecting the dots anywhere from Floridian shorepounds to Ulu doesn’t translate so well into other aspects of his intellectual life.

    Creative talent vs non-theoretical reality is apparently a zero-sum game for him as well. They seem to be inversely proportional qualities amongst the jetset artsy elites.

    My guess is that the less hands-on their relationship with their money becomes, the more abstract they tend to be regarding the realities that surround its aquisition. The typical starving artist on the other hand tends to the abstract simply because they just can’t get their hands on the cash.

    A Pity…

    Speaking of compromised connections to reality, I love the “Strolling Bones” headline Drudge uses for the Rolling Stoned ones.

    Perfect.
    They should cut a track.

    Posted by monkeyfan on 2005 08 22 at 06:30 PM • permalink

  30. So… Mick Jagger is in a pissing contest with Maureen Dowd?

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2005 08 22 at 06:58 PM • permalink

  31. The Rolling Stones… as I’ve said before, didn’t my dad used to listen to them?

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 08 22 at 07:45 PM • permalink

  32. paco

    Jagger probably wrote the lyrics after consulting with his marketing people

    Agreed, I dont buy for a moment that he gives two turds about foriegn policy…werent the Stones regarded as a sort of an anti-hippie band in their hay-days anyway?

    Also, I recall reading somewhere Jagger remarking, “No one ever believes me, when I tell them I only got into music for the money”.

    Yep, just a ploy to get dusty 60s & 70s-era rockers to open up their wallets and contribute to Mick’s favorite cause.

    Drop-out or not, Mick knows his economics.

    And Bush a Neo-con?

    Such sloppy lyrics, especially from the person who crafted Sympathy For The Devil.

    Posted by Thomas on 2005 08 22 at 09:19 PM • permalink

  33. I can’t get no center 42
    but I try and I try
    I can’t get no….


    jgm,

    Ring any bells?
    Didn’t think so!

    Posted by zefal on 2005 08 22 at 09:50 PM • permalink

  34. In the most recent photos Jagger looks unhealthier than Richards. Dead man prancing.

    Posted by slatts on 2005 08 22 at 10:29 PM • permalink

  35. Monkeyfan—he’s connected enough to his money to avoid paying one ha’penny in UK taxes…

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 08 23 at 12:10 AM • permalink

  36. RE #25, I understand that Mick Jagger got his start in the entertainment industry as an extra in this movie.

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2005 08 23 at 01:15 AM • permalink

  37. Here’s something Keith Richards said a little while ago about terrorism . . . go Keef!

    Posted by Young and Free on 2005 08 23 at 07:34 AM • permalink

  38. Oh bless you Vinny..

    Posted by crash on 2005 08 23 at 08:58 AM • permalink

  39. #35 Richard McEnroe.

    ...At least his cabal of prescription fillers, accountants, and marketing consultants is connected to all that grey haired hippie cash.
    ;^)

    Posted by monkeyfan on 2005 08 23 at 10:55 AM • permalink

  40. It’s a bit pathetic, a 60+ year old man singing I can’t get no satisfaction… what in the nursing home? Reminds me of Homer Simpson’s old man in the retirement village: please do not let reality in the door.

    Posted by mr magoo on 2005 08 23 at 07:44 PM • permalink

  41. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.