<< KELVIN SHELVED ~ MAIN ~ ENVIRONMENTAL DISASTER >>

THREE-STEP PLAN

Step one. Compare the work of satirists Jim Schembri and Iowahawk.

Step two. Ask yourself: “Of these two, who deserves my money?”

Step three.

Posted by Tim B. on 03/09/2007 at 08:09 PM
  1. Schembri deserves to have something tipped on him. Preferably something stinky.

    Posted by Nic on 2007 03 09 at 08:23 PM • permalink

  2. By the way Tim, you have the links the wrong way around.

    Posted by Nic on 2007 03 09 at 08:26 PM • permalink

  3. It’s not really a fair contest is it. After all poor old Chris is working under the constraints of a traditional MSM high calibre newspaper where you can’t say,“syphillitic commie scumnozzle”, mind you “That’s right Ann, you anorexic Nazi whore” would probably be perfectly acceptable.

    Posted by alien kiwi on 2007 03 09 at 08:31 PM • permalink

  4. As no one else is likely to write anything nice about Schembri on this thread, I’ll just say that at least with him your keyboard’s always safe.

    Iowahawk, however, needs to print some kind of spillage disclaimer. One day he’ll be sued.

    And just to be annoying…Tim, you have the links the wrong way around.

    Posted by Dminor on 2007 03 09 at 08:36 PM • permalink

  5. Links fixed, Nic - man, Iowahawk will have me killed for that.

    Posted by Tim B. on 2007 03 09 at 08:37 PM • permalink

  6. Was worried you’d fix it before I hit “submit”, Tim. Man, that was a close one.

    Posted by Dminor on 2007 03 09 at 08:39 PM • permalink

  7. And what’s up with the “war on terror”?

    “And whats the deal with air-line food?”

    I knew they’d come after me in Afghanistan. That’s why I sold my time-share and caught the first cab out.

    “Thank you!!!...hahaha…I’ll be at The ChuckleShack in Topeka all week folks!”

    “See ya there!”

    Posted by Thomas on 2007 03 09 at 08:39 PM • permalink

  8. I remember Schembri as a reasonably intelligent film reviewer for Melbourne’s Decrepit Daily, but that was twenty years ago. And I’m 46 as of Jan 4 last, so maybe old age is playing tricks on my memory too.

    Posted by SwinishCapitalist on 2007 03 09 at 08:45 PM • permalink

  9. Tim, I felt the third link was a bit of a cheap trick, but as I like Iowahawk anyway, I gave him $2, although probably he/she (dunno who they are) only got $1.

    Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 03 09 at 08:46 PM • permalink

  10. There’s another positive note, Dminor!

    Schembri is not likely to cause you to guffaw loudly and disturb your fellow cubicle dwellers.

    Courtesy goes a long way, y’know!

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2007 03 09 at 08:48 PM • permalink

  11. PS: I sent Iowahawk $10…..I hope that we see a suitable post concerning Schembri and Osama, possibly describing a menage a trois with Helen Thomas.

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2007 03 09 at 08:50 PM • permalink

  12. #11 - Well, thanks for that! Boy, with those sort of mental images to be picked up for nothing here, I’ll never need a dietician.

    Posted by SwinishCapitalist on 2007 03 09 at 08:54 PM • permalink

  13. I’ll donate, but only if Iowahawk uses the money prudently, like expanding his carbon footprint by installing that tank engine in his daily driver.

    Posted by joe bagadonuts on 2007 03 09 at 10:03 PM • permalink

  14. Anybody who uses the phrase “hitting the big 5-0” unironically does not deserve money, or breath.

    Posted by Jim Treacher on 2007 03 09 at 11:17 PM • permalink

  15. Who’s Jim Schembri?

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2007 03 09 at 11:50 PM • permalink

  16. That Ann Coulter is sex on legs!  Woof!

    Posted by Snuffy on 2007 03 10 at 12:03 AM • permalink

  17. A fairly Schembriolic article, all in all.

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 03 10 at 12:50 AM • permalink

  18. Wimpy
    S/he goes by the nom de nom of “David Burge” FWIW.

    Cheers

    Posted by J.M. Heinrichs on 2007 03 10 at 01:31 AM • permalink

  19. Speaking of unreadable tripe in the Sydney Morning Herald, I also commend to you this weekend’s Alan Ramsey column.

    Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 03 10 at 01:39 AM • permalink

  20. It’s just plain unfair to compare anyone with Iowahawk.

    Posted by saltydog on 2007 03 10 at 03:02 AM • permalink

  21. #3: You’re sure right about what is considered acceptable in the MSM, alien kiwi. Just this week there was this bit of ad hominem leftist snark directed at Ann Coulter by Michael Gawenda in the SMH:

    ANN COULTER … does not have angel eyes.

    In fact the best-selling author’s eyes are narrow and hawkish.

    It was part of a sordid rhetorical device Gawenda used in his opening paragraphs to set the tone of ridicule that followed in his feature article on the Conservative Political Action Conference held in Washington.

    Posted by splice on 2007 03 10 at 03:26 AM • permalink

  22. I haven’t been able to read Iowahawk’s piece yet.  I can’t get past the two pictures at the top, I’m laughing so much.

    Posted by anthony_r on 2007 03 10 at 04:11 AM • permalink

  23. “I hope that we see a suitable post concerning Schembri and Osama, possibly describing a menage a trois with Helen Thomas.”

    Jesus, I damn near puked reading that one.

    Posted by Dave Surls on 2007 03 10 at 04:41 AM • permalink

  24. I used to edit a student newspaper, and I’d get quite a few lame satires like Schembri’s, which wouldn’t make the cut. Quality standards at The Age are not so high, apparently.

    Posted by Blithering Bunny on 2007 03 10 at 04:55 AM • permalink

  25. That Ann Coulter is sex on legs!  Woof!

    careful, Snuffy, I hear she uses that gun on males after mating.

    Posted by Contrail on 2007 03 10 at 06:06 AM • permalink

  26. the only amusing thing about the Schembri piece is that it’s under entertainment- the Age really is just a rest home for leftard scribblers too crappy even for the ABC.

    Traceeeeee’s piece drawing parallels between Mohammed Dawood and ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ is much funnier- even if that wasn’t the intention.

    “Hicks… transition from ratbag to cause celebre to pin-up boy for national disquiet is almost complete.”

    Echoes of a morality play

    Posted by eeniemeenie on 2007 03 10 at 07:02 AM • permalink

  27. The time-tested Hardin method of reading web parody : read the first and last lines, and you’ve got it all.  It’s particularly effective on the Borowitz Report, but seems to work everywhere.

    It doesn’t work with the newspaper guy.  He seems to avoid it by not letting you know what the hell he’s on about for a while.

    I prefer, for insults, the automatic thesaurus-based insult generator

    $ insult 20
    You monstrous clothes hamper of infective Jersey offscourings
    You dismal compact of rickety narwhal turd
    You contemptible pannikin of venerate mackerel detritus
    You heartbreaking paten of contagious wild ox sialorrhea
    You sickening coffin of miasmatic toadfish smut
    You cacophonous butt of venenous Russell’s viper scourings
    You burdensome tassie [Brit] of toxical rat terrier effluent
    You unsavory canister of pestiferous sucker evacuation
    You disfigured boot of tumorigenic serval elimination
    You tyrannous chest of virulent shoebill expectoration
    You moving trencher of indigestible quetzal precipitations
    You miasmal housewife of grubby borzoi scum
    You sad pod of adulterous dingo residue
    You distasteful crane of unhygenic toy terrier rags
    You awful saucer of poisonous mugger ejectment
    You fetid palette of chlorotic siskin BO
    You displeasing sideboard of neuralgic osprey extrusion
    You grinding blackjack of phthisic goose dung
    You irking urn of veneniferous gunnel sputum
    You consuming calyx of scabietic mew ruins

    If you can compile C, there’s a classic (ascii) unix archive for the program here

    The algorithm being at bottom You (repulsive) (container) of (infested) (animal) (waste).  You could do it manually with a thesaurus and dice.  No need for originality!

    I’d really suggest, if you can implement text-to-speech, using it instead of music on hold

    Posted by rhhardin on 2007 03 10 at 09:20 AM • permalink

  28. And that’s not just any gun. That’s a .50-caliber Desert Eagle.

    Posted by rightwingprof on 2007 03 10 at 10:45 AM • permalink

  29. Time to say “sorry” and put on my finest head- tilt of compassion (dunno how to be honest) for allowing the rather foul Schembri chap (or his ancestors) to escape from my country and subject you all to his drivel…With a surname like that he HAS to have Maltese roots - Gawd, I hope my local media doesn’t get wind of him, those loony lefties would have a collective orgasm!

    Of well, we can’t all turn out right…

    Posted by Deepdiver on 2007 03 10 at 10:57 AM • permalink

  30. The choice is quite clear.  Incidentally, Scott Ott’s Scrappleface is quite entertaining as well.

    Posted by RyanOH on 2007 03 10 at 02:24 PM • permalink

  31. I had a Pabst Blue Ribbon with iowahawk once. I still have the bottle, man!

    Posted by Rob C. on 2007 03 10 at 06:18 PM • permalink

  32. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.